• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments - NCAA: no wins taken away, no postseason ban

new.PNG

So, even after they get their punishment for their current investigation, it looks like they still have the Weiss stuff and now maybe the Corum/LLC bullshit on deck. So, the "cheeseburgers" investigation started in what? 2021? This current investigation looks like it'll wrap up at some point this year, so that's 4 solid years under investigation with more on deck. So, they're looking at...5,6,7 straight years dealing with the NCAA? DPIA. Dirtiest program of all-time (DPoAT)?
Upvote 0

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments - NCAA: no wins taken away, no postseason ban

As has been said before:

1) you don’t tell players not to cooperate if you think no rules were broken
2) you don’t tamper with evidence (delete text messages etc) if you think no rules were broken


There are many other things that could be said here based on things we have very good reasons to believe, but the 2 above are known, already proven, and show without any doubt that several staff members knew.

Based on the safe assumption that the ncaa knows a lot more than we do at this point, it is safe to say that they will not be entertaining any claims of ignorance. The only appropriate response to DFBIA claims of ignorance is derisive laughter
And hilariously, this is what is probably going to cost them the most. The cheating in and of itself is bad enough, but rule #1 with the NCAA is don't be a difficult asshole. And they did this right on the heels of another investigation where they were punished largely for their lack of cooperation rather than the wrongdoing itself. Bad enough that their prior HC is now blacklisted from the game. Just stunning arrogance and incompetence.
Upvote 0

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments - NCAA: no wins taken away, no postseason ban

Has scUM themselves ever actually denied the allegations? Seems like they've only played the "well everyone does it" line.
I don't think denying was ever an option. Pretty sure they were confronted with hard evidence from the jump.
Upvote 0

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments - NCAA: no wins taken away, no postseason ban

As has been said before:

1) you don’t tell players not to cooperate if you think no rules were broken
2) you don’t tamper with evidence (delete text messages etc) if you think no rules were broken

There are many other things that could be said here based on things we have very good reasons to believe, but the 2 above are known, already proven, and show without any doubt that several staff members knew.

Based on the safe assumption that the ncaa knows a lot more than we do at this point, it is safe to say that they will not be entertaining any claims of ignorance. The only appropriate response to DFBIA claims of ignorance is derisive laughter
Upvote 0

LGHL You’re Nuts: What is one change you would make to college football?

You’re Nuts: What is one change you would make to college football?
Brett Ludwiczak
via our friends at Land-Grant Holy Land
Visit their fantastic blog and read the full article (and so much more) here


NCAA Football: CFP National Championship-Ohio State at Notre Dame

Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

Your (almost) daily dose of good-natured, Ohio State banter.

From now until preseason camp starts in August, Land-Grant Holy Land will be writing articles around a different theme every week. This week is all about what we would do if we were in charge of our favorite position group, team, conference, or sport. You can catch up on all of the Theme Week content here and all of our ”If I Was in Charge” articles here.



We can all agree that we love college football. Even though some areas of college football definitely could use an overhaul, we tend to put the issues we have at the back of our minds during the season.

Now that spring practices are over and we are just twiddling our thumbs until late August when the Buckeyes kick off their 2025 season against Texas. This is a perfect time to look deeper into the sport we love so much, and kick around some ideas on how to make it better. Over the last decade, there have been a number of new issues that have popped up, which seem to dominate the conversation when it comes to areas of college football that are a little tougher to stomach.

Today, we are going to look at things we would change about college football. Maybe it’s a rule change that you feel is desperately overdue for change. Or it could be changing something that has recently been introduced into college football, like NIL or the expanded playoff.

A change you are passionate about making could be something simple, like kickoff time for games or uniforms that are worn for certain contests. With so many hardcore college football fans, there should be an interesting collection of ideas on how to make college football better than it has ever been.

Today’s question: What is one change you would make to college football?

We’d love to hear your choices. Either respond to us on Twitter at @Landgrant33 or leave your choice in the comments.


Brett’s answer: Adjusting the college football schedule


The current college football schedule was fine when there was just a four-team playoff. Now that the College Football Playoff features 12 teams, and likely will soon expand to 16 teams, there is absolutely no reason to start the season as late as they currently do. I know that Labor Day weekend is unofficially the start of the college football season, but I think the start of the season needs to take place more in the middle of August.

There are a number of reasons I am in favor of an earlier start to the college football season. The first is that there really isn’t much going on when it comes to the sports world in mid-August. There is baseball and some preseason NFL games, although we are not about to pretend that preseason NFL games are important events. Even though some schools likely won’t have started fall classes yet with an earlier start to the season, student-athletes should have no problem overlooking that fact since they are now able to pocket NIL money.

Another reason an earlier start to the season makes sense is that there is way too much for college football programs to deal with when it comes to December and January, especially if teams are involved in the playoff.

The awards circuit, December’s National Signing Day, the opening of the transfer portal, and the coaching carousel all take place in December and January. With the season starting Labor Day weekend, there is a crush of activities coaches have to focus on when the regular season ends.

At least if you start the season a few weeks earlier, then things can be spaced out a little better. Plus, an earlier start to the season makes conference title games a little easier to stomach. With the current schedule, they feel a little unnecessary, but if the season starts earlier, then they can be held, and more of a rest period following the conference title games can be given to those teams playing in them.

The earlier start to the college football season also won’t have college football going up against the NFL as much at the end of the season. Last year, the CFP title game felt a bit more like an afterthought since a lot of people’s main focus was on the NFL playoffs. There really is no reason for the final college football game of the season to be played in the latter half of January.

Even when the championship game of the four-team playoff felt a bit late. At the very latest, the title game should be held the day after the final day of the NFL regular season game of the year. While a Monday championship game isn’t ideal, it is obvious that the NFL won’t back down from holding Saturday games in December and January, so Monday title games are something we’ll have to continue to deal with.

Maybe there is some pushback from teams farther south that an earlier start to the season wouldn’t work because of the heat in some areas. Too bad. Any complaints about player safety went out the window when championship teams are now expected to play 15-16 games a season.

Broadcast partners should be in favor of an earlier start to the season since, with no other sports really on in mid-August, ratings would be even bigger than normal since fans are so starved to see any type of real football at that time of the year. An earlier start to the season, to go along with an earlier end to the season, is something we need sooner rather than later.


Matt’s answer: Introducing a college football commissioner


I’m not going to lie, Brett is 100% correct on this. Many of the ways that the college football season has grown and expanded are positive, as far as I am concerned. However, the way that they have impacted the schedule is approaching a net negative for me. The physical impact of the increased number of games, the overlap with the NFL playoffs impacting excitement, the issues with the academic schedule and the transfer portal, and much more have created just as many problems as these things were meant to solve.

So, while Brett is right that the schedule needs to be pushed up, what we really need is a college football commissioner to help guide the sport through the idiocy that has popped up as it has naturally evolved.

The big story of last week was whether or not Ohio State is playing too many noon games; now the big story of this week is whether or not USC and Notre Dame are going to continue scheduling their annual rivalry game. Both stories are deeply rooted in the ever-changing business of sports media rights and conference expansion (which itself is just a byproduct of sports media rights).

So they are both emblematic of just how complex and complicated the modern world of college football is given the billions of dollars being spent on it, but they are both incredibly stupid stories. Of course Ohio State’s biggest games of the year (outside of The Game) should be played at night, or at least 3:30 p.m. ET. Save the noon kicks for MAC schools and maybe an occasional up-and-coming Big Ten squad.

And of course USC and Notre Dame should play every season. I know that Notre Dame isn’t in the Big Ten, so that makes it complicated yada yada yada, but both sides need to grow up and get a contract signed that locks them into the series for the next 100 years.

You know who could make sure that these types of things got done, and ensure that college football doesn’t completely abandon what makes it the most emotionally satisfying (and sometimes torturous) sport in existence? Someone who, by the power vested in them by the member conferences, has the authority to squash incipient stupidity for the good of the sport. Someone who, in similar sporting structures, is known as a commissioner.

Rodger Goodell wouldn’t suffer this asininity; he would make a ruling, and that’s the way it would be. For decades, CFB fans have wanted someone to expedite common-sense rule changes to keep the sport the best in the world, but no one has yet been installed to this seat of authority. Instead, we have had to see every well-intentioned decision splinter off into a dozen or so easily foreseeable unintended consequences that have undermined the initial move.

We need someone to sail the ship through these increasingly choppy waters and get us onto the solid shores on the other side of NIL, conference realignment, and media rights deals; and I am willing to make the sacrifice and volunteer as tribute. So, friends, with great humility, today I declare that I am ready to serve as college football’s first commissioner.

Continue reading...

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments - NCAA: no wins taken away, no postseason ban

The DFBIA even admit at times that they cheated although they try to play it off as no big deal. For example downplaying it with "It was just people in the crowd with iPhones what harm is that!"
Nothing, except the rule that specifically says you can’t do that.
Upvote 0

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments - NCAA: no wins taken away, no postseason ban

I thought they all collectively denied it from the start. It seemed like Hairball got Ono in his corner early on and dug in until the seasons end. Then once they won the Natty and the off season began, he could go forward with his NFL plans and who he was going to take with. I think Moore was made the scapegoat so he could continue his CFB coaching career. Because even with a show cause, some team at the level or Purdue, Texas Tech or Oregon St would take a chance on him

The few scUM fans I know that aren't insufferable just want this to go away and want the punishment to just come down so they can move on. But they know something happened, and when confronted will admit the team cheated. But those people are in the sheer minority.

The DFBIA even admit at times that they cheated although they try to play it off as no big deal. For example downplaying it with "It was just people in the crowd with iPhones what harm is that!"
Upvote 0

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments - NCAA: no wins taken away, no postseason ban

Has scUM themselves ever actually denied the allegations? Seems like they've only played the "well everyone does it" line.
I thought they all collectively denied it from the start. It seemed like Hairball got Ono in his corner early on and dug in until the seasons end. Then once they won the Natty and the off season began, he could go forward with his NFL plans and who he was going to take with. I think Moore was made the scapegoat so he could continue his CFB coaching career. Because even with a show cause, some team at the level or Purdue, Texas Tech or Oregon St would take a chance on him

The few scUM fans I know that aren't insufferable just want this to go away and want the punishment to just come down so they can move on. But they know something happened, and when confronted will admit the team cheated. But those people are in the sheer minority.
Upvote 0

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments - NCAA: no wins taken away, no postseason ban

The intellectual dishonesty is truly stunning.

The amazing part is that it’s the majority of SCUM faithful that have succumbed to this madness. For a group that prides itself as being superior to all others you would think that 20-30% would be telling the others to STFU.

They have no actual defense to what they did, so it's all about muddying the waters as much as possible, screaming whatever BS they can think up to try to sway perception.
Upvote 0

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments - NCAA: no wins taken away, no postseason ban

It takes a comically insane amount of mental gymnastics to get ones self to actually believe that scUMs coaches were just innocent bystanders and had no clue what Stallions was actually doing.

Basically that scenario involves Stallions handing over all his info on every opponents signs and game plans to the coaches and them saying "oh cool thanks" asking no questions and just implementing said info into their gameplans basically just trusting a very "low level staffers" intel that they have no clue how he came to obtain it.

Because all coaches take serious coaching advice from their low level staffers.........
Was he technically on staff? I thought he was just a hanger on who was paid from vacuum start up under the table
Upvote 0

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments - NCAA: no wins taken away, no postseason ban

I can't get past the part where he says they didn't break any rules. That's one thing we all know for certain. He went to and sent other people to games to advance scout, which breaks a very specific rule.

Has scUM themselves ever actually denied the allegations? Seems like they've only played the "well everyone does it" line.
Upvote 0

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments - NCAA: no wins taken away, no postseason ban

The "the coaches had no idea what he was doing!" shit has always been hilarious, even more hilarious that this far along some of them are still trying to push it.
I can't get past the part where he says they didn't break any rules. That's one thing we all know for certain. He went to and sent other people to games to advance scout, which breaks a very specific rule.
Upvote 0

Filter

Latest winning wagers

Back
Top