ScarletInMyVeins said:

Just for reference. Ted Ginn ran a 4.37 in his combine

Click to expand...

He didn't run at the combine and he was coming off a high ankle sprain. That 4.37 comes with a massive grain of salt

Just for reference. Ted Ginn ran a 4.37 in his combine

BuckBackHome said:

Combine results are unreal. And he is definitely not a player who just tests well. The young man delivered on the field for OSU season after season.

Click to expand...

I disagree. We all knew that he was physically gifted but what I saw was a player out of position more often than not and bad leverage. I really don't think he's that good of a player.

buckeyemania11 said:

It won't let me properly link this tweet for some reason but to no one's shock more scumbag behavior out of this program

View attachment 85864

Click to expand...

“Michigan Man.”

pnuts34 said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

Cyborgs

I have to admit, other than that return against UCLA, he never really played like he had that kind of speed, that typically stands out. Never thought he was slow or anything but 4.28?? Sheesh, kid made himself some coin today.

Also the genetics in that family. Good lord.

Tanner said:

No idea why he wasn't the main guy on kick and punt returns

Click to expand...

Trust the coaches.

Nah there's no question they are still playing hard but at times they go 100 miles a hour in the wrong direction so to speak. OSU, especially basketball, needs a effective sports psychologist.

dragurd said:

First trick play they ran he looked slow but the guys kept saying he was one of the fastest guys on the team. Clearly he was

Click to expand...

He was sure fast on the one he housed against UCLA.

No Harden. No Mitchell.

Second verse, same as the first. Cleveland man

Jesus wept. Even women's softball is infected!

First trick play they ran he looked slow but the guys kept saying he was one of the fastest guys on the team. Clearly he was

No idea why he wasn't the main guy on kick and punt returns

Mike80 said:

nah just blame the coaching - it's far easier for lazy takes to flourish that way.....

Click to expand...

Both things can be true. The coaching can be not good along with NIL not being good either. It's equally lazy to just excuse everything else because of NIL.

When it comes to Diebler so far, he's a coach with no figured-out identity of his own and it really shows with the team. The offense is usually just a mess of 5 guys trying to play 1 on 1 ball. which really only works if you have a absolutely loaded roster. Defensively the individual talent is not good but there is just no direction and cohesion as a unit, you can make up some for individual faults if you have a good plan in place, but we do not have that, the result is guys looking like they are lost a lot of the time and giving up the comical amount of wide open looks that we do. These are things that good coaches can somewhat mend with a good system and plan, now no coach is taking this team to the sweet 16 or beyond, but I don't think you let bad coaching off the hook just because Diebler doesn't have a highly funded roster. YES, NIL needs to get better. But the actual coaching by Diebler needs to wildly improve next season as well.