Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Mark Kunz @MarkKunz44 3m
OSU UFAs
Kenny Guiton to Vikings
Philly Brown & Andrew Norwell to Carolina
Marcus Hall to Indy
CJ Barnett to the Giants
They thought there was a chance he wouldn't be available at #26. They thought there was a (strong?) possibility of another team trading with Philly, KC, Cincy, or SD to jump up and get him ahead of the Browns.
1. Maybe the reports are false or misleading.
2. Maybe the Browns realize that a proven way to win in the NFL is a strong running game and defense, with solid quarterback play.
Seattle won the Super Bowl with the #26 passing attack, the #4 rushing attack, #1 scoring defense, and #1 yardage defense
San Francisco went 12-4 and lost in the NFC Title Game with the #30 passing attack, the #3 rushing attack, #3 scoring defense, #5 yardage defense
Carolina went 12-4 and made the playoffs with the #29 passing attack, the #11 rushing attack, the #2 scoring defense, and the #2 yardage defense
Unless you have a Brady or a Manning or a Rogers or a Brees, your best way to win is to build up the running game and the defense and to have an efficient QB
Here's a stat for you: In 2013, Josh Gordon had more receiving yards (1,646) and touchdowns (9) than the entire wide receiving corps for the San Francisco 49'ers (1,627 yards, 8 TD's). And those stupid 49'ers drafted another running back (Carlos Hyde) in the second round, and no wide receivers through round three.
EDIT: And by the way, the 49'ers leading receiver was 33-year old Anquan Boldin who probably runs a 40-yard dash somewhere in the 5.0 range. So don't tell me that you need superstar wide receivers to win in the NFL.
Overall, you seem like someone who learned football from a video game. Maybe you should pay more attention to what happens on the field.
1- maybe they are, but so far they don't appear very misleading
2- Yeah because having no WR really has worked wonders for us in years past lol. We never have a WR worth a crap and ironically we sucked still. The NFL is a passing league now thru and thru.
3- Seattle won bc they had an out of this world one of the best D's in a long long time. Seattle also has a stud RB, something we MAY or MAY NOT have now as we wait and see. That doesn't mean that their passing was terrible, they didn't utilize it that much because they didn't need to do so. We don't have a Marshawn Lynch...
Here is a fact for you, Seattle and San Fran are not in the AFC North... they don't have the same kinda teams, they aren't even in the AFC. Comparing what they had to do to be successful with us is silly. Denver made it to the SB with one of the best passing attacks ever, and how ironic that all of a sudden their RB's played a ton better last year since they actually had a passing game to open it up.
Overall you seem like someone who knows less than they think. Look at all the Superbowl winners since 2000, a large majority of those teams had a good passing game. New England 3 times, Colts with Manning, NO Saints, GB, NYG had good passing with Eli, even Big Ben got his last one done largely with a good passing game. All a lot better than ours will be without Gordon if he misses. Nobody is saying we should expect to have as great as passing game as these guys, but the days of RB winning SB's is over.
Trying to make your point is one thing, but your arrogant "I'm superior to you listen here" attitude is pathetic my man. I know plenty about football. Nobody is asking for us to be the best passing team in the league, but last time I checked our RB now Ben Tate has never been a #1 guy, has a tendency to get dinged up, so it's perfectly reasonable to want a nice passing game so we don't have to depend soley on him.... your highness!
San Francisco and Seattle aren't in the AFC North?!?!? Wow! Learn something new every day
Further research would show you that both Harbaugh and Carroll are in the Bill Walsh coaching tree - Bill Walsh invented the West Coast offense but he also predicated it on a good running game and strong defense.
In addition to Connor Shaw and Cromwell from Alabama State here are the WRs signed or linked to the Browns
The Browns drafted no wide receivers, but are being linked to at least four undrafted free-agent wideouts. They are: San Jose State’s Chandler Jones, Florida State’s Kenny Shaw, Ball State’s Willie Snead IV and Vanderbilt’s Jonathan Krause. Oklahoma State tight end Blake Jackson also has been connected to the Browns.http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2014/05/south_carolina_quarterback_con.html#incart_m-rpt-1
2- Yeah because having no WR really has worked wonders for us in years past lol. We never have a WR worth a crap and ironically we sucked still. The NFL is a passing league now thru and thru.
Denver made it to the SB with one of the best passing attacks ever, and how ironic that all of a sudden their RB's played a ton better last year since they actually had a passing game to open it up.
Overall you seem like someone who knows less than they think.
Look at all the Superbowl winners since 2000
a large majority of those teams had a good passing game. New England 3 times
, Colts with Manning, NO Saints, GB,
NYG had good passing with Eli
Big Ben got his last one done largely with a good passing game.
but the days of RB winning SB's is over.
Did I say I don't want the Browns to have a good D or running game? If you think this team will compete with a WR core of Nate Burleson, Andrew Hawkins, and Greg Little, then you are on some good drugs my friend.