• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

BP Fantasy Baseball est. 2008 (Current Champion = Ahiacitian)

I don’t understand separating out the OPS (on-base + slugging) into two separate categories. Why is this preferred to the current average and OPS? I like combining a traditional old-school stat like batting average, where there is a little luck and chance involved, with the OPS stat that rewards disciplined hitters with extra base hit capabilities. IMO, the current hitting categories are ideal.

I do understand updating some of the pitching categories. My preferred pitching categories are the following:
W - traditional old-school category where there is a little luck and chance involved
QS - rewards good starting pitchers that can make it deeper into games
Saves + holds - Combine the two categories to de-emphasize relievers
ERA
WHIP
K/9 - rewards quality pitchers in general either SP or relievers. I get where K/BB also does that too so don’t have strong feelings either way here.
To me BA has become like steals, it's a unique stat that probably requires a specialist who won't give you much in other categories. Obviously a few unicorns still do it all but the majority of the game is played by guys who hit about .220 in BA terms. I personally just get sick of even looking at it on a given night but it doesn't really matter.

I was going for making it more engaging for each manager in terms of thinking through the lineup construction.

HR/RBI/SLG/TB...all of these are more power related than anything and that is the common archetype today, so to varying degrees of usefulness you will have that on your roster as the majority.

Runs, Steals and OBP are a different skill set. These days BA is too. These are change ups categories to me. You have to make a decision about carrying them.

I would mix 3 power related and no more than 3 "change up" type categories no matter if they are old school or new school.

As far as pitching goes I think we need to really think about what a starting pitcher means anymore. Three guys threw more than 200 IP last year. High was 207. On average you are talking 5-6 IP per start. If we want to emphasize starters over relievers the way to do it is QS and K/9.

Wins and Holds are the same animal to me. Situationally dependent, team dependent, luck. If we want to really hone in on who drafted the most skilled pitcher add k%-BB% and there is no question. I personally don't get any aversion to stats that are not as mainstream because you don't sit there and count them yourself anyway. It isn't stratomatic, the computer will tell you how the guy did.

I'm willing to do whatever but those are my thoughts on shaking things up a bit.
BA, W and Holds are dead and dumb stats. There are alternatives that do a better job of making the roster strategy more engaging and we don't have to do any math (which is always good) so why not give a couple of them a shot?

*What we still haven't done is hear what general problem we want to solve. Emphasize SP over bullpen? Non power over power in hitting? All of these stats are just tools for how to do that. What do people like about the experience of being a team manager and what do they want to change? Then the stats are simple.

I personally have benefited from the bullpen over Starters set up of the past couple years but would absolutely be open to switching it up to make it a different experience this year. My guys will all fucking suck anyway so what do I care?
Upvote 0

Cincinnati Bearcats (Juggalos official thread of Faygo)

That's not why we were punished, and you know it. We were punished because the head coach learned about it, covered it up to keep those players eligible and then lied about to both the ncaa and the university.

Had he forwarded the email to the university and let them notify the ncaa, the players would have sat out some games, the program would have gone unpunished and Tressel would have been celebrated for actually embodying the integrity that he so cynically tried to promote himself as representing.
Yeah, and that's not as bad as coseches literally paying kids in duffle bags and McDonalds and you know it. Tress lying and covering should've still not gotten the punishment that many other schools did for far worse offenses. My point is the NCAA picked and chose what punishments to dole out without any clear reasoning. scUM had a massive sign stealing scandal and nothing happened to the team other than the coach was suspended for a few meaningless games, which was worse? UNC had a cheating scandal where tutors were writing papers and taking tests for athletes, and the punishment, NOTHING! But Tress lying about tattoos, and trying to cover it up(which every coach has done when accused) gets a far worse punishment... It makes no sense and you know it
Upvote 0

Ohio State @ Iowa, Wednesday Feb. 25, 9pm EST, BTN

That's what I'm saying. It looks like he's lost the team and 3 more losses would reaffirm.
They're two games removed from their best game of the season. They gave a top 20 team a good game on the road while down 3 of their top 6 players. They went to Iowa (who is no slouch) and lost a game they weren't supposed to win starting a guy in the post who should be a 5 minute/game guy because two of their bigs were out. Did they play well, no, but if they're going to tank a game, heal up, and come out with some fire then that was the game to do it.
Upvote 0

Cincinnati Bearcats (Juggalos official thread of Faygo)

The NCAAA should get no credit whatsoever. They could've made rules and guidelines on payments to players in the 1970's and chose to keep the free labor model and act like the players were "student athletes". They caused this vacuum and expected the US government to fix the mess they created. And when it didn't happen things only got worse based on their ineptness. They knew programs were paying players for decades and chose to turn a blind eye or give a slap on a wrist, but then turn around and harshly punish a team who's players sold their memorabilia for tattoos
That's not why we were punished, and you know it. We were punished because the head coach learned about it, covered it up to keep those players eligible and then lied about to both the ncaa and the university.

Had he forwarded the email to the university and let them notify the ncaa, the players would have sat out some games, the program would have gone unpunished and Tressel would have been celebrated for actually embodying the integrity that he so cynically tried to promote himself as representing.
Upvote 0

LB Arvell Reese (All B1G, B1G LB of Year, All American, National Champion, New York Giants)

Yeah I have to admit now I’m a bit sad lol… that defense was just ridiculous.

I tend to think we could’ve cut 6 and 8 loose last year more.
Its devastating. When you look at the roster, this might be the most talented team to not win the championship since the Buckeyes beat the 2002 Miami juggernaut.

Downs top 5
Reese top 5
Smith if he could come out. Top 5
Tate 1st rd
Etc, etc, etc.
Upvote 0

Cincinnati Bearcats (Juggalos official thread of Faygo)

Everyone loved to whine about the ncaa except Cinci, myself and a few others, especially after Tressel drew their ire. Yet as some pointed out, as flawed as they were they just might have been better than the vacuum of authority their absence would create. Well, welcome to the vacuum.

Maybe Conor Stalions can repair it.
The NCAAA should get no credit whatsoever. They could've made rules and guidelines on payments to players in the 1970's and chose to keep the free labor model and act like the players were "student athletes". They caused this vacuum and expected the US government to fix the mess they created. And when it didn't happen things only got worse based on their ineptness. They knew programs were paying players for decades and chose to turn a blind eye or give a slap on a wrist, but then turn around and harshly punish a team who's players sold their memorabilia for tattoos
Upvote 0

Technology Gone Wild: Rise of the Machines

Login to view embedded media
we're making
@blocks
smaller today. here's my note to the company.

####

today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone.

first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay.

we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly.

i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures.

a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers.

we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold.

to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward.

to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow.

jack
Login to view embedded media
Upvote 0

Filter

Back
Top