Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They got lucky to not lose 5 last year (including the bowl game) with a far easier schedule.He’s going to have figure it out fast too, because they’re trying to put talent around him, but idk if he’ll be good enough to make the right reads consistently and they will also need to lead in every game early. They won’t have the type of offense to strike fast if they get down like 2 or more tds early.
I just don’t see them losing 5Gms. This program finds the most ugly ways to win. I don’t see them winning against Oregon. But the rest of those games are toss ups to me. And I hate that they can rely on a defense to keep them in tight games.
Underwood couldn’t transfer, he makes too much and I’m sure that contract is ironclad too if Ellison has anything to do with it. Whittingham and his staff are probably the worst coaches this kid can have. they run an offense That is successful, but much more reliant on bigger, stronger as a primary runner than as a passer, but when called upon to pass will almost always move the chains.
I don’t see a snowballs chance he benches Underwood. He would have to be the worse QB in all P4, like multiple turnover games and double digit passing in multiple games type bad! His salary dictates that he starts and Whittingham is coming in knowing that. But he has a built in scapegoat if it doesn’t go well, “he wasn’t my guy, if I had my guy I would’ve been successful “. If they don’t make the CFP, or B1G championship he has that line locked and loaded. And even still, he’ll be stuck with Underwood for another season
He’s going to have figure it out fast too, because they’re trying to put talent around him, but idk if he’ll be good enough to make the right reads consistently and they will also need to lead in every game early. They won’t have the type of offense to strike fast if they get down like 2 or more tds early.The only system Underwood is really currently fit for is handing it off more often than not. You aren't gonna be successful airing it out with him either with his accuracy issues.
WRs are gonna be pissed anyway. Last year 3 of Utahs top 5 pass catchers were TEs or RBs and the #2. WR only had 15 catches. After the #1 WR the ball pretty much goes to TEs and RBs
I just don’t see them losing 5Gms. This program finds the most ugly ways to win. I don’t see them winning against Oregon. But the rest of those games are toss ups to me. And I hate that they can rely on a defense to keep them in tight games.Which is exactly why you'll see Patricia employ the 3rd "safety" more like a fast outside linebacker when they play in November...unless something significantly changes between now and then.
They aren't beating Oklahoma without being able to pass the ball either....or Oregon. Or Iowa. Or likely Indiana.
I think they are more likely to go 7-5 than 9-3...and the chances of them getting into the playoffs are around the same as me banging Sydney Sweeney....
I don't see much changing. Whittingham and staff aren't exactly gurus when it comes to developing passers. If Underwood were serious about improving himself he woulda transfered but instead he's holding the bag at scUM to play in a offense that's probably less friendly in terms of getting a QB to the pros than the Sherrona Harbaugh offense.
Underwood couldn’t transfer, he makes too much and I’m sure that contract is ironclad too if Ellison has anything to do with it. Whittingham and his staff are probably the worst coaches this kid can have. they run an offense That is successful, but much more reliant on bigger, stronger as a primary runner than as a passer, but when called upon to pass will almost always move the chains.And the new staff isn't as beholden to his aura (if that's the right word)....it will be far easier for them to say "well, we tried, he sucks" and go to that other kid that seems to fit their scheme better.
Not upgrading your dinnerware for 50 years also helps...![]()

Not upgrading your dinnerware for 50 years also helps...It's funny, at work all of the old timers pack their lunch. All of the snot nose entry level kids order Ubereats for lunch. The get their nails did and their eyebrows plucked at the Vietnamese salon next door for a cool 80 bucks. Kids today have no chance because they can't manage their money. The thing is they're all living with their parents and aren't taking advantage of the opportunity to save. When I graduated high school I had nothing. I joined the service, lived in the barracks, ate at the mess hall and when I got out I worked remote Alaska for four years, free room and board. My only expense was my calling card. To be honest all though I've never been a super earner or a savvy investor as an adult I've never had money problems.

It's funny, at work all of the old timers pack their lunch. All of the snot nose entry level kids order Ubereats for lunch. The get their nails did and their eyebrows plucked at the Vietnamese salon next door for a cool 80 bucks. Kids today have no chance because they can't manage their money. The thing is they're all living with their parents and aren't taking advantage of the opportunity to save. When I graduated high school I had nothing. I joined the service, lived in the barracks, ate at the mess hall and when I got out I worked remote Alaska for four years, free room and board. My only expense was my calling card. To be honest all though I've never been a super earner or a savvy investor as an adult I've never had money problems.100%. Values surrounding consumerism and debt have gone completely in the toilet.
100%. Values surrounding consumerism and debt have gone completely in the toilet.I think the big difference between now and 1980 is it's so much easier to blow your money now in comparison to back then. Back then you pretty much had to leave home and walk into a store or restaurant or wherever it was to blow your money. Now you can do it from home sitting on your ass using a cash app.
I think the big difference between now and 1980 is it's so much easier to blow your money now in comparison to back then. Back then you pretty much had to leave home and walk into a store or restaurant or wherever it was to blow your money. Now you can do it from home sitting on your ass using a cash app.$100 in 1980 purchasing power is the equivalent of about $400 today. So, a $3 hourly wage in 1980, would need to be $12 hourly today to have the same purchasing power. $17 > $12.![]()