colobuck79 said:

She seems nice.

Click to expand...

CincyInterloper said:

That’s what I was thinking, but then the rule says the player is suspended for the first half of the next game “if the [second] foul occurs in the second half of a game.” Maybe they mean a subsequent game?

Click to expand...

Jaxbuck said:

So as I understand it, you get called for targeting in 1H, you still play then have to sit out 2nd half so I guess you technically could get a second targeting penalty in the 1st half?

I dunno. Its CFB targeting rules so I'm sure it's fucked up.

Click to expand...

Tomateaux Quinoa Gumbeaux said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

colobuck79 said:

I’ve heard the UCLA games have better quality.

Click to expand...

Jaxbuck said:

I'd pay $6 just to watch all the crazy hot poon walking around

Click to expand...

CincyInterloper said:

“If a player is flagged for targeting for the first time, he will only be suspended for the second half of the current game, instead of the second half and the first half of his team's next contest. If the player is called for his second targeting penalty, he will then be suspended for the first half of the next game, if the foul occurs in the second half of a game.”

I must be missing something. How can a player get a second targeting foul in the second half if he is suspended from the second half for the first foul?

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/25493214-explaining-college-football-2026-conference-realignment-12-team-playoffs-new-rules

Click to expand...

colobuck79 said:

Hook me up with two of those $6 tics where I can watch an incredibly bad product from seats where you can’t see anything. Stepping over piles of feces on the way into and out of the venue is a bonus.

Click to expand...

gmen6981 said:

And shit like that right there is why I still somehow love College Football.

Click to expand...

Tomateaux Quinoa Gumbeaux said:

I concur. The issue or controversy is that he allegedly used ai to 100% produce it. I don’t know if that’s true. It if he used it to help for certain sections or portions, or spell check, I have no issue with that either.

Click to expand...

Jaxbuck said:

I'm with Druckenmiller here. The calculator analogy is dead on. AI is just a tool that helps save time, spell check etc etc.

If you don't put any thought into it and just use AI to essentially spam the world and pass it off as your own thing, then that's the line I feel shouldn't be crossed.

You aren't going to throw me about Druckenmiller's acumen just because he used AI to help him write it.

Click to expand...

Tomateaux Quinoa Gumbeaux said:

Billionaire Stanley Druckenmiller’s WSJ Op-Ed Criticizing Bessent Was Written With AI

“I write everything using AI now,” Druckenmiller, who questioned the treasury secretary’s bond market interventions, said.

www.notus.org

Click to expand...