• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Yahoo, Tattoos, and tOSU (1-year bowl ban, 82 scholly limit for 3 years)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by date Sort by votes
BuckeyeNation27;2068406; said:
I took that as the witness he used for his story.......which makes it a [Mark May]ty way of saying what he's saying. Perhaps his witness was lying his ass off and didn't feel like taking it any further than a reporter.
Click to expand...


That douche retweeted and said the source that wouldn't co operate was not TP.
 
Upvote 0
bkochmc;2068403; said:
Remember... it was the NCAA, not Ohio State, that said those players could play in the Sugar Bowl. If part of this decision was made because those 5/6 played in the Sugar Bowl then the NCAA is punishing Ohio State for something they sanctioned.
Click to expand...

Didn't we mislead the NCAA about how long we knew about the tatoo's?
 
Upvote 0
NEVER in history has a school ever been issued a postseason ban for a Failure to Monitor. NEVER. The NCAA gave into the media pressure to "hammer" a self-reporting department, punishing players who did their shit the right way because everyone involved is gone now. (Besides Gene Smith, who may be gone soon)

Unfuckingbelievable.
 
Upvote 0
southcampus;2068369; said:
Yeah, because additional schollies and additional post season bans are the same thing.
Click to expand...

They also tacked on an additional year to the self-imposed probation, Einstein. Don't be fucking stupid. They were going to increase what ever we self-imposed...period. The only reason they couldn't increase our self-imposed bowl ban was because there was none to increase.
 
Upvote 0
haters arnt that happy...this doesnt do long term damage like 30 schollys will do to SC and the 1 year bowl ban wont scare off Urban...it takes the excitement off of next year because Im looking at the schedule and Ohio State could run it

If I think back to where we were as a fan base when the rumors kept coming and coming we are in a much batter place now.....


and no kids were raped
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top