• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

What's Wrong With the 2013 Defense?

What's Wrong With the 2013 Defense?

  • Talent / Players

    Votes: 29 11.8%
  • Scheme / Coaching

    Votes: 127 51.8%
  • Both are substandard

    Votes: 71 29.0%
  • Neither - B1G offenses are unstoppable

    Votes: 10 4.1%
  • I don't care - just fire Fickell!

    Votes: 8 3.3%

  • Total voters
    245
Here's a list of the 38 current Buckeye players who were recruited to play defense, and how I would rate them as of today (star, hit, miss, bust, unknown):

Class of 2009
C.J. Barnett............hit
Pittsburgh Brown........miss

Class of 2010
DL Darryl Baldwin.......bust (moved to OL)
DB Christian Bryant.....hit
DL J.T. Moore...........bust (moved to TE)
CB Bradley Roby.........star

Class of 2011
DL Michael Bennett......hit
DL Chase Farris.........miss
LB Curtis Grant.........miss
CB Doran Grant..........hit
DT Joel Hale............hit
DE Steve Miller.........miss
LB Ryan Shazier.........star
DB Ron Tanner...........miss

Class of 2012
DB Devan Bogard.........unknown
DE Jamal Marcus.........hit
LB Joshua Perry.........miss
DB Tyvis Powell.........unknown
CB Armani Reeves........miss
DT Tommy Schutt.........hit
DE Noah Spence..........star
DL Adolphus Washington..hit
LB Camren Williams......miss

Class of 2013
DB Eli Apple............unknown
DB Vonn Bell............unknown
DL Joey Bosa............star
DB Cam Burrows..........unknown
DB Gareon Conley........unknown
DT Michael Hill.........unknown
LB Trey Johnson.........unknown
DB Darron Lee...........unknown
DE Tyquan Lewis.........unknown
LB Mike Mitchell........unknown
DT Donovan Munger.......unknown
DT Billy Price..........unknown
DE Tracy Sprinkle.......unknown
DB Jayme Thompson.......unknown
LB Chris Worley.........unknown

Stars.......4
Hits........8
Misses......8
Busts.......2
Unknowns...16

So there are a lot of young, inexperienced players on defense who have not yet had a significant chance to play, and many of the older players have not reached their potential. Note that there are only two fourth-year and two fifth-year players on defense.

Of the "star" players, Bradley Roby has severely underperformed this season after an All American campaign in 2012. I have Joey Bosa ranked in this category, but clearly his best days are still ahead of him. Ryan Shazier and Noah Spence have both performed very well, but neither has provided enough impact plays this season.

Of the "hits", C.J. Barnett makes the list primarily because he is a multi-year starter; his erratic play could easily land him in the "miss" column. Christian Bryant's career is over due to a season-ending injury. Of the remaining payers (Michael Bennett, Doran Grant, Joel Hale, Jamal Marcus, Tommy Schutt, and Adolphus Washington), none has shown "star" potential to this point, although Marcus, Schutt, and Washington still have plenty of time to develop. Note that former offensive lineman Chris Carter would rate a surprising "hit".

Of the "misses", Curtis Grant is the most disappointing, not only because of his immense potential coming out of high school, but also because a solid middle linebacker could really shore up this defense. Joshua Perry has also been a disappointment, and he will need to improve greatly in order to remain in the rotation next season. Steve Miller has provided some valuable minutes at defensive end, but there is almost no chance that he will ever be able to supplant younger, better players like Spence, Washington, Marcus, and Bosa.

The "bust" category is misleading, since the vast majority of the busts are no longer with the team. The following 20 players would still have eligibility, but left the team due to injury, discipline, or transfer:

Class of 2009
LB Dorian Bell
CB Dominic Clarke
DL Melvin Fellows
LB Jonathan Newsome
LB Jordan Whiting
DB Jamie Wood

Class of 2010
LB David Durham
DB Adam Griffin
DB Chad Hagan
LB Scott McVey
DE Jamel Turner

Class of 2011
DB Jeremy Cash
LB Connor Crowell
DB DerJuan Gambrell
DE Kenny Hayes
LB Ejuan Price

Class of 2012
DB Najee Murray
LB David Perkins
DL Se'Von Pittman
LB Luke Roberts

Although few of the "busts" listed above would have seen significant minutes anyway, Dominic Clarke proved in his brief tenure that he could provide valuable depth at cornerback, and Melvin Fellows, Scott McVey, and Jamel Turner were all very highly rated prospects who never saw the field due to injuries. Safety Jeremy Cash transferred to Duke in the midst of the TatGate scandal, and he now leads the Blue Devils with 66 tackles, to go along with 7.5 TFL's, 2 interceptions, and 2 forced fumbles.

So, bottom line, I'm voting for "talent" - too few stars, too many busts, not enough time for the young talent to emerge.
Only a couple on your list I would disagree with; class of 2010, you have both Moore and Baldwin down as busts. Granted Moore is nowhere to be found, but Baldwin is our backup left tackle. Baldwin may end up our starting left tackle next year.

Also, I think Bennett has played as well as anyone this year. I think he deserves a star if you're giving one to Spence and Bosa. It may be another two years before Urban is stocked with the players he wants.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Since "Nothing" wasn't an option here, I didn't vote.

Guys, you gotta realize a simple fact if you are an adult and have followed this program for any amount of time. This is "THE" Ohio State University, one of the if not the greatest football programs in the country. Every week we take our talents up against overmatched opponents who want to beat us a helluva lot more than we want to beat them. For most teams on our schedule, playing the Buckeyes is their BCS National Championship game. On top of that, we're playing good teams in the Big Ten that are loaded with talent, that is not as good as ours, but with motivation "brings" it to us. All that's accomplished since Coach Meyer got here is an undefeated program. Enjoy it! Continue to Embrace it. And quit bitching about how we win games.

Peace
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Both is my vote, which stands currently around 30%. Not sure why it isn't higher. As LJB showed with the player list, we have too few stars, too many misses, etc. But even Urb has said in his last 2 pressers that he was surprised at how slow we have been to react in-game to new looks from the opposing offense. I think Fick is a good recruiter and not a bad LB coach but I'm not sold on his in-game management.
 
Upvote 0
We do have to keep in mind that this program has won 19 consecutive games with a defense that is leaky. I believe (others on here disagree) that the style and degree of dynamism in an offense affects the defense directly. Sparty is a great example in terms of an offense helping a defense and Indiana is an example of an offense hurting a defense. The very elite teams have dynamic O's and great D's, but it's hard to get that combination in CFB. You have to have the right mix of good coaching, and player talent and player experience.

After looking at LordJeff's breakdown, I think I have been over-estimating the talent and depth on the defensive side of the ball. I think the DL is in very good shape with talent and depth. The LB's were an area we knew was going to be a problem. Where the Bucks were supposed to be strong - in the secondary - hasn't panned out due to CB's injury, Roby's suspension and struggles, etc. I have considered that they also may be trying to do their jobs + trying to keep an eye on helping the LB's with their coverage. In essence, that there isn't trust between the units to do their jobs. Secondary play is hard enough just getting your responsibilities handled. If your attention is divided, things aren't going to go well.

That said, there is still a coaching/scheme aspect to this. We made Colter and Simien look like John Unitas with soft coverage. Some of the receivers in that game didn't have a defender within 10 yards of them. Finally D Grant made a great read, came off the deeper guy, broke on the ball to the nearer reciever, and got a pick. My thought was, "It's amazing what happens when you get yourself within arm's length of a receiver. They should try that more often."

We have played enough football at this point to know that Ohio State is not good at getting consistent pressure with a 3 or 4 man rush, and we also know that we can't cover well. I just want the coaches to pick one or the other, and it seems to me that pressure is the easier one to do. No doubt the secondary will get burned when the pressure doesn't get there, but that's happening anyway. I can live with that, but I am going to blow an artery if they choose to to not pressure or cover.
 
Upvote 0
See the 2006 NC Florida Gators as example which is perfect because Urb is the constant. tOSU had a pretty good offense that year and UF shut us down while still putting up 41 points of their own. I think it's a weak excuse to say we can't have a good defense becuase of our style of offense. Oregon is a bigger threat to win it all this year because their defense is better than years past. Their offense is still solid, the defense for them has just improved. In the game last week Iowa had long sustained drives in the first half while our offense sat on the sideline watching. Having a weak defense that allows another team to eat up the clock keeps our dynamic offense off the field. That's how we beat Oregon in the 2010 Rose Bowl. We flat out owned time of possession. To me, we have turned conservative on offense at times this year because with a great O Line and Hyde being the bell cow that he is we just don't see the point in being more aggressive on offense and potentially putting undo pressure on our defense. Better to grind along even though we loose style points. The hidden advantage to all this however is that we are becoming a very unique offense and a potentially dangerous one: a team that can strike quick but also a team that can ground and pound. That's not something you see very often.
 
Upvote 0
Re-read. I do believe that you can have a great offense and a great defense. But I also believe that it is a difficult combination to achieve. Certain elements have to be in place.

Everything else you said: +1.
 
Upvote 0
Since "Nothing" wasn't an option here, I didn't vote.

Guys, you gotta realize a simple fact if you are an adult and have followed this program for any amount of time. This is "THE" Ohio State University, one of the if not the greatest football programs in the country. Every week we take our talents up against overmatched opponents who want to beat us a helluva lot more than we want to beat them. For most teams on our schedule, playing the Buckeyes is their BCS National Championship game. On top of that, we're playing good teams in the Big Ten that are loaded with talent, that is not as good as ours, but with motivation "brings" it to us. All that's accomplished since Coach Meyer got here is an undefeated program. Enjoy it! Continue to Embrace it. And quit bitching about how we win games.

Peace
Dubs, good to see you back again...the other guys are on schollies too! Tress & Urb have kept our kids grades up so that's a winner as well. Peace
 
Upvote 0
Actually rewatched the game today and here are my notes on the defense on the 1st half:

1) Kept seeing us shade our LBs over the weak side on all of Iowa's strong sets early on...no idea why we were doing that, they could run the stretch to the strong side at will. That is schematic, especially when Grant doesn't have the speed to get to his gap when he is already at a disadvantage.

2) Vrable is right...the kicked the shit out of us up front. Sure they ran strong sets we weren't ready for but they weren't even standing their ground. Spence was getting pushed around by TEs and not keeping the edge (he was noticeably the worst performer in the 1st half, maybe should have had Bosa and Washington out there), Hale was getting pancaked by his man, and Bennett wasn't manning up to his double teams. Woody Hayes rolled over in his grave with how soft we played. Bosa was the only guy I saw doing his job in the first half. All we needed was a little push to delay the ball carriers read and we weren't getting it very often. We don't have the back 7 for our front 4 to be able to play like that. It is a sad truth but the young DL has to carry this defense.

3) LBs were missing their reads and getting lost in coverage, mostly Perry and Grant...guys are huge liabilities in the passing game. Also just sitting there and waiting to be blocked...be aggressive and freaking try to make a play! If you screw up, screw up going 100%. I hate to say it but Perry has been a colossal disappointment so far this year. I know he is young and I do not want to pick on him, but he simply is not even close to getting the job done (really stood out in a bad way when I rewinded the defensive plays). As for Shazier...not sure if he is ready for the NFL physically. Needs to put on another 15 pounds, he constantly flies in but still gets pushed back at the point of attack.

4) With how bad Roby got hosed, I was impressed with his reaction. Clearly not happy but frankly, I might have had a piss-poor reaction. Great maturity. Speaking of which, I would have expected us to play with some real fire after that call...I didn't see it. When you lose one of your leaders, it should light a fire under your ass.

5) Pittsburgh Brown was noticeably the weak link in the secondary...Vonn Bell time and NOW. Not a lack of effort and I feel bad for the kid, but we need a change.

6) Toughness...we had them in many 3rd down situations and couldn't get off the field, that comes down to toughness of the whole defense. That is pathetic.

Here are my notes from the 2nd half:

1) Better push up front and adjusted to shade the LBs to the strong side. Did much better against the stretch runs that way.

2) Tighter coverage. Played some press on 3rd down and got them off the field...weird.

3) Reeves/Barnett can't come close to catching their tight end on that TD? wtf...awful coverage by Reeves. Watch your zone, not the QB...let him right behind him. Perfect throw by Ruddock though.

4) We got them off the field on third down. Our offense actually controls the ball really well and gets them a break, but they have to get themselves off the field first. That's why I'm good with an aggressive defense...even if they hit the big one on us, our offense isn't held off the field like they were in the first have. We had much better time of possession in the first half and that was a result of playing more aggressive.

5) Bennett really stepped it up and started getting penetration to shut down the slow developing run plays.

6) Doran Grant had great coverage for the most part all game...at this point in the season, he has played the best in the secondary. You never notice because it is nothing spectacular, but he does his 1/11th and plays lock-down coverage.

7) Love the pressure when we slide Bosa down and bring Marcus off the edge. Bosa can finesse to get there or just bullrush, love his game. Either way, funnels the QB right to Marcus.
 
Upvote 0
A caller said that he sees a lot of poor tackling in the secondary, but Meyer said the defense is tacking pretty well this year.

Meyer said there is no question that the defense is getting better. He said he envisioned some great growing pains this year with the amount of turnover from last year. “We are certainly getting better.” He said this week will be a good test.

Meyer said, “I think Luke Fickell is one of the top defensive coordinators in the country.” He said he expects to lose 1-2 assistant coaches over the next year or two as they go on to become head coaches.

He [Meyer] said they're really thin at corner right now.

http://www.the-ozone.net/football/2013/Penn State/TwoMinuteDrill_Thursday.html
 
Upvote 0
We do have to keep in mind that this program has won 19 consecutive games with a defense that is leaky. I believe (others on here disagree) that the style and degree of dynamism in an offense affects the defense directly. Sparty is a great example in terms of an offense helping a defense and Indiana is an example of an offense hurting a defense. The very elite teams have dynamic O's and great D's, but it's hard to get that combination in CFB. You have to have the right mix of good coaching, and player talent and player experience.

After looking at LordJeff's breakdown, I think I have been over-estimating the talent and depth on the defensive side of the ball. I think the DL is in very good shape with talent and depth. The LB's were an area we knew was going to be a problem. Where the Bucks were supposed to be strong - in the secondary - hasn't panned out due to CB's injury, Roby's suspension and struggles, etc. I have considered that they also may be trying to do their jobs + trying to keep an eye on helping the LB's with their coverage. In essence, that there isn't trust between the units to do their jobs. Secondary play is hard enough just getting your responsibilities handled. If your attention is divided, things aren't going to go well.

That said, there is still a coaching/scheme aspect to this. We made Colter and Simien look like John Unitas with soft coverage. Some of the receivers in that game didn't have a defender within 10 yards of them. Finally D Grant made a great read, came off the deeper guy, broke on the ball to the nearer reciever, and got a pick. My thought was, "It's amazing what happens when you get yourself within arm's length of a receiver. They should try that more often."

We have played enough football at this point to know that Ohio State is not good at getting consistent pressure with a 3 or 4 man rush, and we also know that we can't cover well. I just want the coaches to pick one or the other, and it seems to me that pressure is the easier one to do. No doubt the secondary will get burned when the pressure doesn't get there, but that's happening anyway. I can live with that, but I am going to blow an artery if they choose to to not pressure or cover.

I've been having similar thoughts.
As awesome as that Dontre Wilson ruse / Miller-to-Brown TD was, in some ways it hurt us by putting Iowa's offense right back on the field at a time when our Defense probably could've used a breather to make some adjustments and regroup.
A lot of times it feels like we have to put shackles on the Offense and play closer to Tressel-ball in order to compensate for Defensive issues. Still, it's nice to know that they can score in a hurry if they need to - especially at the end of a half.
Overall it seems like our defense is just waiting for the opponent to beat themselves. We seem kind of average in the turnover department, and that seems to be another indication that the defense is a bit passive. We're not making them beat us by putting them under pressure.
To that end, I really hope we come out against Penn State trying to either harass the QB and/or force him to throw the ball into tight spaces. I don't think we got a sack against Iowa (if we did it had to be near the end), but they did start getting to him and put him on his back a number of times in the 2nd half forcing several bad throws that probably would've been easy 5-7yd completions in the first half. And soon enough he started making mistakes -- almost giving Doran a pick-6 and finally Powell hauling in an interception to end their final chance at scoring.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top