Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He was drafted by the Rams as a safety, got injured in preseason (ACL or similar) and on IR for his rookie year. He was then cut/released.tibor75 said:yeah I think he was on injured reserve for a year and then cut and never invited back. Or maybe his injury never completely healed. I'm surprised not much has been heard about him.
tibor75 said:I guess I'm the only one who finds it hard to believe that the worst starting running back in OSU history has a place in the NFL.
i think perhaps a different phrase would be more appropriate, hard to call a guy who is on the WHAC walls for second highest bench in his category and one of the highest squats an under-achiever, he obviously worked very hard, just didn't translate on the field..........it's obvious he lost confidence along the way, and only gained it back for short periods of time, because he showed flashes even later in his career when he was running more on instinct (down the stretch in '03)Lydell Ross was simply a grotesque under-acheiver.
Good point. Team captain voting is not a popularity contest. Players earn the status as team captain. Lydell Ross earned it somehow.BuckeyeFROMscUM said:realize that people who actually know the guy made him a team captain for some reason.
what??? underachiever would mean lack of effort, for lack of trying..........he was an underperformer, didn't meet expectations, could be labeled a disappointement, but not an underachiever, it was not for lack of effort...............i guess by your definition Mo Hall was also an underachiever?That lack of on-field translation is exactly why he's an underachiever. Bench and squats are not "achievements" in the game of football. It's not about hard work, it's about production.
"underachieving" has nothing to do with a lack of effort. Underachieving is to be less successful than expected, to fail to fulfil one's potential. doesn't mean they didn't try hard. "His" definition is the conventional one.MistriBuck said:what??? underachiever would mean lack of effort, for lack of trying..........he was an underperformer, didn't meet expectations, could be labeled a disappointement, but not an underachiever, it was not for lack of effort...............i guess by your definition Mo Hall was also an underachiever?