My fault, my comparison was a flawed one in this scenario. Take out Haskins to Fields. But I hope you understand my point. OSU has a varied type of QBs over the years, and each has helped one another to continue the QB success.
I do understand your point. It's an interesting concept. I don't think I'll argue for or against it - I really don't know if each is helping the next one out or not. But... I do know that each time OSU gets a new quarterback, I say, "We're screwed - that guy was awesome." And for the last 10+ years I've been wrong.
Smith to Boeckman - probably a drop in talent but we did win the Big Ten and go to the national championship game.
Boeckman to Pryor - doesn't really fit in, because Pryor just came in and grabbed his spot.
Pryor to Bauserman - ha - probably the only time I was right in this game.
Bauserman to Miller - easy choice to give Miller the ball.
Miller to Barrett - Miller was the faster guy, but Barrett could run the read option better than anyone I can think of. Maybe a drop in talent, but maybe not. Definitely not a "we're screwed" drop.
Barrett to Jones - Let's put it this way: when Barrett came out of the game against *ichigan, I thought, "Hold *ichigan to just one more touchdown, and maybe win this in overtime." I gave Jones no credit. Of course, Ohio State's scores from that point on were a long run by Zeke and a fumble returned for a touchdown. So I still gave Jones no credit. When Ohio State scored first against Wisconsin, my first thought was, "At least we didn't get shut out."
Barrett to Haskins - No way Haskins can work in this offense, right? Right? (crickets)
Haskins to Fields - Well, eventually there has to be a drop off in talent, right? Right? (crickets)
Fields to Stroud - Alright, I give up trying to guess how the next guy is going to do for us. Shut up and watch the game.