xcrunner;1307874; said:
6) I'm fine with his decision to take it to the outside. Granted, I'm not a football expert- quite the contrary- but in my opinion, that was just a great play by the safety. 99/100 times it doesn't result in a fumble. Most of those 99 result in a first down. A lot of the others might result in 6 points. It seems like we love to talk about how we shouldn't sit on a 3 point lead, and then when we don't, we criticize it...
8) I liked the playcalling.
There, I said it. I liked the playcalling. Someone else said 12/25 first down plays were passes. It didn't seem like that to me, but either way, I didn't notice running plays on first down every single time like some people have said. Someone else said that Pryor passed to 8 different receivers. Again, it seems like it was a little less than that.. I can't think of all 8... But he definitely passed to quite a few.
Regarding the playcalling/those who think we should open it up more... Seriously? You think we should have Pryor try to do more? Again, not a football expert, but it seems to me like we're having Pryor do just the right amount. It also seems to me that throwing Pryor into a scenario where he might throw 4 picks in a game and ruin his confidence isn't the best idea.
11) Our secondary... Wow. Aside from one blown coverage... Which hurt... very impressive. Penn St. has a great QB and 3 GREAT WR's, and we shut them down pretty darn effectively.
12) Hey, Brandon Saine got a nice catch. I like using him as a WR. He's got talent but it isn't really showing up on the football field. Using him the way we did today is, in my opinion, the best way to start at least. I continue to hope (with less confidence as the season goes on) that he can have a breakout game. I'm starting to think he's going to end up being the type of player that has 1 or 2 pretty good plays a game. I'd be fine with that.
Now the cons...
2) OLine. I don't know what the problem is exactly... But it's obvious there is one... Talent? Doesn't seem like it can be. Effort? Possibly. Lack of depth? Certainly doesn't help. Coaching? Again, possibly, I hope whatever it is, we can fix it, because... Wow. Pre-season, I was not expecting the line to be this bad.
edit- Regarding the point that the defense played poorly because they allowed points at the end. This is an honest question- does this mean that you expect them to try harder when it's more important? That's what it comes across to me... In my opinion the D played just as well all day, the points just happened to be scored at the end. Maybe I'm wrong,
6. Well, he had to take a step to his right due to the lack of push the O-line got, but then he should have got his pads low, tucked the ball away, cut inside the safety and pushed through him for a yard and we have a new set of downs. It appeared their D-line was finally wearing down a little on that drive.
8. You have to ralize that the passing on first down stat is totally skewed by the end of the game, right? Plus, it's the
type of passes on first down.
It's mainly the playcalling (and field position) that had us in third and long all night.
Regarding "opening up the playbook". I think we have it "opened up" enough - just not utilizing it correctly regarding down and distance. It's plays vs situations that needs to be opened up.
I think most people are just calling for less predictability in each situation.
11. Our secondary played great. The only thing I was surprised with is that in this game for some reason, their ball skills deserted them. Most of the time they had no clue where the ball was. that was one thing they had definitely improved on this year.
12. Brandon Saine is about 50%. After one play I saw him go off to the sideline, and he could hardly run at all.
Even at 100%, I don't know how much of a contributor he will be, but hoping for a comeback next year.
2. There is a lack of physical talent on the O-line with this bunch. It's pretty obvious. But I don't think Bollman/Tressel do enough to help them wehre they are weak sometimes.
defense - once again, like last year's IL game at the end, Heacock didn't get aggrressive enough after our last punt, especially when they sent out the backup QB. We didn't bring a safety down into the box until they had gotten three first downs and were deep in our territory. Of course, the facemask penalty was the second-most disastrous play in the game, too. But if we hold them to 3 and out, or hold them after the penalty, we have plenty of time on the clock.
Of course, I was against us punting ther at the end anyway. But that's just me.
Sportsbuck28;1307879; said:
Comparing scUM's defense in any way whatsoever to this PSU defense just doesn't work. Yeah, we can beat them running 39 times into the teeth of their defense, because it's relatively toothless, but that wasn't going to work against PSU.