• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Defensive Staff Next Year?

So, USC needs the absolute best possible coach to turn to top level again. OK.

And the talent "in-state" means zilch when ranking how a college does in football. Look at where Ohio State is, and the vast majority of starters are from out of state...

How do you think many are ranking the best coaching jobs? Instate talent is a big factor.
 
Upvote 0
Uh, yeah it is. If you can "win easier" at USC, then why has USC had at least three losses a year since 2012 (except for last year win they played only six games), and in five of those years have gone 7-6, 8-6, 5-7, 8-5, and so far this year 4-5. USC has had three years out of 10 where they've won 10+ games (11, 10, and 10). Penn State has won 11 games in three of the last six.
If James Franklin turns in the exact same results at usc, they'll keep them for 10 to 20 years.

At Penn State there's an ambivalence about his performance.

At usc, you can recruit a five-star quarterback within the city limits many years. You have to battle zero to one and a half programs on the west coast for your talent. UCLA just refuses to field the confident football team or try. Oregon has thrown tons of money at it but in the end Penn State seems to be their ceiling as a program, and not the pre b1g version.

Pollsters would also love for a West Coast team to be relevant with that much history.

You can certainly have a lot of conversations about why it's been difficult for anybody to sustain success there, but a top-notch coach would absolutely dominate with such a layup when it comes to thin competition for talent and wins on the field amongst West Coast teams.
 
Upvote 0
A defensive coordinator on the verge of getting head coaching jobs and deciding to not start over another school has almost nothing to do with whether or not the two schools are on equal footing.

One school has been elite for most of 50 years. The other has gone almost a decade at a time without truly being a top program.

No one said it was a bad job. That doesn't make it one of the three or four schools that smoke every other program in America when it comes to talent acquisition.

My point is, he's not going from being a DC at one power school to another at the same position. He's not going from UC to OSU, UC to ND, Purdue to OSU. ND and OSU are seen on equal footing to many coaches.
 
Upvote 0
My point is, he's not going from being a DC at one power school to another at the same position. He's not going from UC to OSU, UC to ND, Purdue to OSU. ND and OSU are seen on equal footing to many coaches.
ND and OSU are not similar jobs for Marcus Freeman to take as a head coach.

Marcus also wouldn't move from psu to OSU as a DC. That doesn't make them equals.
 
Upvote 0
ND and OSU are not similar jobs for Marcus Freeman to take as a head coach.

Marcus also wouldn't move from psu to OSU as a DC. That doesn't make them equals.
I was saying Purdue, not PSU. And no, Freeman wouldn't move from PSU to OSU, as a DC. Just like he wouldn't take the same position with OSU.
 
Upvote 0
I was saying Purdue, not PSU. And no, Freeman wouldn't move from PSU to OSU, as a DC. Just like he wouldn't take the same position with OSU.
I know you didn't say that. I'm saying it. I'm using two very inequal programs, Penn State and Ohio state, to point out that despite their disparity, Marcus still wouldn't switch between them as a defensive coordinator on the verge of a serious promotion. Your logic is severely flawed.

Marcus would be risking his entire future over an uncertain change to a new program. And as a defensive coordinator, there's not a giant difference between Ohio State and Penn State. There's a monumental one when it comes to being the head coach of the program which is what's being discussed here (PSU, USC, ND, OSU).

He absolutely would take Ohio State over Penn State every day of the week, and not because of his background.
 
Upvote 0
If James Franklin turns in the exact same results at usc, they'll keep them for 10 to 20 years.
Bingo. Just as Penn State has kept Franklin at PSU for eight years and would keep him there as long as he kept them competing for division/conference titles, USC would do them same if he lead USC to 10+ win seasons every other year.
 
Upvote 0
If James Franklin turns in the exact same results at usc, they'll keep them for 10 to 20 years.

At Penn State there's an ambivalence about his performance.

At usc, you can recruit a five-star quarterback within the city limits many years. You have to battle zero to one and a half programs on the west coast for your talent. UCLA just refuses to field the confident football team or try. Oregon has thrown tons of money at it but in the end Penn State seems to be their ceiling as a program, and not the pre b1g version.

Pollsters would also love for a West Coast team to be relevant with that much history.

You can certainly have a lot of conversations about why it's been difficult for anybody to sustain success there, but a top-notch coach would absolutely dominate with such a layup when it comes to thin competition for talent and wins on the field amongst West Coast teams.


I know you didn't say that. I'm saying it. I'm using two very inequal programs, Penn State and Ohio state, to point out that despite their disparity, Marcus still wouldn't switch between them as a defensive coordinator on the verge of a serious promotion. Your logic is severely flawed.

Marcus would be risking his entire future over an uncertain change to a new program. And as a defensive coordinator, there's not a giant difference between Ohio State and Penn State. There's a monumental one when it comes to being the head coach of the program which is what's being discussed here (PSU, USC, ND, OSU).

He absolutely would take Ohio State over Penn State every day of the week, and not because of his background.

It sounds like we're saying the same thing! I think USC is a much better job than Ped St, and was referring to Franklin taking that job, not Freeman. I also agree that the talent in CA is better and makes for a better coaching experience, if the right coach can get it reeled in and on track. But the HCs they have had, have been mediocre to bad. Franklin would be their best hire since Carrol.

I never mentioned Freeman to Ped St, until you did. I just didn't see why so many OSU fans think he's suddenly coming back to replace Coombs because he's an alum. If he wanted the OSU job so bad, he would've taken it instead of ND. My argument has been that being a DC at OSU is similar to being one at ND(and even Ped St). I never brought up Freeman as a HC, only by stating that the only way we'd see Freeman at OSU, is to fill a HC vacancy.
 
Upvote 0
Bingo. Just as Penn State has kept Franklin at PSU for eight years and would keep him there as long as he kept them competing for division/conference titles, USC would do them same if he lead USC to 10+ win seasons every other year.
Penn State fans are a little more anxious because they believe they are a top five program that was held back by things beyond their control. Most USC fans don't know the starting running back.

I'd say the bar is a lot lower in California, and not just because of how it's gone every time besides Pete Carroll.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Yes, really

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikebe...tflanks-lsu-and-gets-its-man/?sh=69a4e6752a3b

Freeman makes $1.6m/yr and Kerry Coombs makes $1.4/yr
My quote that you mention is in reference to Marcus Freeman leaving from ND for OSU. And me saying that it'd be a lateral move. Those salaries makes my point. I mentioned nothing about HC salaries

That’s not what you said, not even close. You said “offer coaches equal compensation” which is clearly false. Kelly has to take 80% less than Saban just to keep a few good coaches around. Overall, ND has never paid assistants market value. That’s why they lose so many. Tommy Rees makes under $700k as their OC and he’s a Broyle’s award finalist. Kevin Wilson makes double that.

Lateral move #1.

https://www.uhnd.com/football/2015/02/07/tony-alford-leaving-notre-dame-ohio-state-19434/

Lateral moves #2 and #3.

https://irish.nbcsports.com/2012/01/02/warinner-and-hinton-leave-as-coaching-staff-shakes-up/
 
Upvote 0
That’s not what you said, not even close. You said “offer coaches equal compensation” which is clearly false. Kelly has to take 80% less than Saban just to keep a few good coaches around. Overall, ND has never paid assistants market value. That’s why they lose so many. Tommy Rees makes under $700k as their OC and he’s a Broyle’s award finalist. Kevin Wilson makes double that.

Lateral move #1.

https://www.uhnd.com/football/2015/02/07/tony-alford-leaving-notre-dame-ohio-state-19434/

Lateral moves #2 and #3.

https://irish.nbcsports.com/2012/01/02/warinner-and-hinton-leave-as-coaching-staff-shakes-up/

Moving them goalposts I see...

If you read the post that you quoted, I specifically was talking about Freeman and the DC position. I was not talking about HCs. And they're obviously paying Freeman market value if he's earning $1.6m, which is $200,000 more than what Coombs is making and on par with CFB's best DCs. And using Rees as an example is just ridiculous! He's been coaching for 6yrs, and Wilson has been coaching longer than he's been alive. Freeman has an 11yr coaching career and has had an upward trajectory, he's not leaving one school as a coordinator to be another school's coordinator. Your points are lost.
 
Upvote 0
Moving them goalposts I see...

If you read the post that you quoted, I specifically was talking about Freeman and the DC position. I was not talking about HCs. And they're obviously paying Freeman market value if he's earning $1.6m, which is $200,000 more than what Coombs is making and on par with CFB's best DCs. And using Rees as an example is just ridiculous! He's been coaching for 6yrs, and Wilson has been coaching longer than he's been alive. Freeman has an 11yr coaching career and has had an upward trajectory, he's not leaving one school as a coordinator to be another school's coordinator. Your points are lost.
I found a home for your schtick.

https://notredame.forums.rivals.com/forums/under-the-dome.8/
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top