• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Columbus Blue Jackets (Official Thread)

Columbus Blue Jackets, NHL reveal next step in TV, streaming plans​

More pieces to the Blue Jackets' TV puzzle were revealed Sept. 2 by the team and NHL, which will now produce local broadcasts.

More: Columbus Blue Jackets land NHL broadcast deal, leaving fans with one big question

Games will be aired on the Blue Jackets Hockey Network, which will be available through cable and satellite providers. Fans can also watch via streaming as part of an NHL multi-year, exclusive streaming agreement with Amazon's Prime Video service.

“Our priority is to make sure our fans have access to our games on television in all of the ways they have been accustomed to in the past, and this new venture ensures that will happen,” Blue Jackets senior vice president and chief operating officer Cameron Scholvin said in a statement. “Whether you have watched games through a cable or satellite provider, or on a streaming service, you will continue to be able to do so.”

The other five teams included in the NHL's agreement with Amazon are the Anaheim Ducks, Dallas Stars, Minnesota Wild, St. Louis Blues and reigning Stanley Cup champion Carolina Hurricanes. Negotiations with specific cable and satellite providers are ongoing, so details about which will carry the Blue Jackets' network will be announced later.

Those interested in streaming through Prime Video can subscribe at $19.99 per month or $99.99 annually. An Amazon account is required to subscribe, whether it's a free account or an existing Amazon Prime subscription. However, those with Amazon Prime will be charged on top of the price they're paying for that service.

That policy isn't applied equally to all six teams, though. Amazon Prime subscribers in Dallas and Anaheim will get access to their regional broadcasts without additional charges, while the Wild, Blues and Hurricanes have the same subscription requirements as the Blue Jackets.

Broadcasts on the Jackets' network will include a 30-minute pregame show, postgame show and the return of all on-air talents who did Blue Jackets games last season, including Steve Mears (play-by-play), Jody Shelley (analyst), Brian Giesenschlag (host), Jean-Luc Grand-Pierre (pre-and-postgame analyst) and Dave Maetzold (reporter/host).

The in-game broadcast will also be simulcast on radio, replacing longtime radio play-by-play announcer Bob McElligott. That move, a cost-cutting measure, was announced July 30 to the chagrin of unhappy fans who took to social media to complain.

The new plans for TV access could also rile up a fanbase that's already displeased with a turbulent offseason that has included trade speculation about Zach Werenski and Kirill Marchenko, contract negotiations that nearly went to arbitration with restricted free agents Jet Greaves and Cole Sillinger, and RFA center Adam Fantilli still needing a contract two weeks before training camp opens Sept. 16 at Nationwide Arena.

Along with the plans to show games through cable, satellite and streaming options, the Blue Jackets also plan to simulcast an undisclosed number of games on free over-the-air networks. Details on those games haven't been released.

There are also two exclusive national broadcast games that won't be shown by the Jackets' new TV network. Those games are Nov. 10 against the Florida Panthers (ESPN+/Disney+/Hulu) and April 8 against the Philadelphia Flyers (TNT).
Upvote 0

SEC (It just means more.. even its losses are wins)

You trying to act like people are upset about a specific amount of money they made while in the NFL for a beat is proof of how disingenuous you're being. Just drop the act.

what act?

I've been extremely clear on my stance.
NONE of these players should be eligible.
none. not a single one.

but if you're going to allow SOME of them, then allow ALL of them.

can't have it both ways.
Upvote 0

SEC (It just means more.. even its losses are wins)

I've said all along that all of this is complete bullshit and shouldn't be allowed at all.

HOWEVER, apply the rules across the board.
either none of them are, or all of them are.

that's it.
You said the CONCEPT is bullshit. But you can't even pretend to admit what LSU is doing is even minorly dirty.
Upvote 0

SEC (It just means more.. even its losses are wins)

Zxavian Harris on the stand. Says he only got paid a total of $190 with the saints and never played or practiced. He only rehabbed the whole time.
You trying to act like people are upset about a specific amount of money they made while in the NFL for a beat is proof of how disingenuous you're being. Just drop the act.
Upvote 0

SEC (It just means more.. even its losses are wins)

No we’re getting dirty but where was all of these lawsuits from the SEC when Alabama signed an active D league NBA player during the middle of the season and had him play on 5 games?
Good question. That was also bullshit. At least you admit it.

SEC (It just means more.. even its losses are wins)

SEC files suit vs. LSU over school's intent to play pro athletes​

The SEC sued LSU in U.S. District Court in Alabama on Thursday, alleging the university is violating the league's First Amendment right of expressive association by ignoring SEC rules that prohibit signing and playing former NFL players.

The lawsuit, which also names the LSU board of supervisors, LSU president Wade Rousse, athletics director Verge Ausberry and football coach Lane Kiffin as defendants, was filed while SEC commissioner Greg Sankey and others testified during a separate injunction hearing in a state court in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

During Sankey's testimony in the state court hearing, one of the plaintiff's attorneys brought up the newly filed federal lawsuit. The revelation sent a buzz through the packed courtroom, as few people were aware of the new development until it was mentioned.

The lawsuit was filed just after midnight on Thursday morning, not during the hearing.

"The SEC has endured and thrived for nearly a century because its members have adhered to that common set of rules, which each member institution, and every coach at those institutions, has agreed to follow," the SEC's federal lawsuit said. "Among the most fundamental of those rules are the longstanding provisions that prohibit individuals who have entered a professional draft, signed professional contracts, or been rostered on a professional athletics team from returning to compete in college athletics (the "Professionalism Rules").

"These rules are built upon an essential principle: college athletics is reserved for students who are actively pursuing an education while competing for their universities. The Professionalism Rules preserve competitive fairness, protect opportunities for high school students and current college athletes, and maintain the distinction between college and professional sports."

The SEC is asking the federal court for a preliminary and permanent injunction "prohibiting the defendants from violating the conference's First Amendment rights by compelling the conference to associate with conduct that is contrary to the Conference's purpose and mission," and a preliminary and permanent injunction "barring Defendants from seeking to deter, coerce, prevent, or punish the Conference for exercising its First Amendment rights."

The lawsuit said the distinction between playing amateur and professional athletes is "critical" to the SEC's structure and governance.

.
.
.
continued
Upvote 0

SEC (It just means more.. even its losses are wins)

From live testimony just now in the Pyburn v NCAA hearing: Mr. Downton: Mr. Sankey, you’ve testified that the SEC follows all NCAA by-laws and incorporates them into your conference’s by-laws, which I appreciate, but did I just hear you say that as the SEC Commissioner, you don’t know what the current NCAA 5 for 5 bylaws that took effect 8/1/26 actually say? Answer: I don’t. It’s the first time I’ve seen this new manual




Jesus Christ!

forget that he’s had two months now to review the official rule (and i’m sure likely was given some sort of heads up before that about the rule). How the hell do you even admit that you didn’t read it before walking into a scheduled court hearing where you know damn good and well it will be brought up?
Upvote 0

Filter

Latest winning wagers

Back
Top