Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not exactly. He just started at tOSU, not his career. It's just that he's now on the 'big stage' at tOSU, and believe there's more eyes on Buckeye Nation than LSU. Day chose him for a reason, now all he has to do is prove he can do it here....Go Bucks!
Looks like Tate Martell in this picture.
The two biggest conferences in college sports released a statement Tuesday saying they do not support the current version of a bipartisan bill designed to regulate an industry struggling for answers in a quickly changing era in which some players make millions.
The SEC and Big Ten conferences said the "bill leaves critical issues unresolved," including not "meaningfully" preempting state laws with a federal one, which has long been considered a key element for a measure to get support from the NCAA and the conferences.
In an interview last week, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who drafted the bill with Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., told The Associated Press "the bill is drafted to preempt state laws that conflict with the provisions in this bill."
The bill, called the Protect College Sports Act, would provide the NCAA with an antitrust exemption to enforce several rules that have been recently challenged in court, including limiting transfers and athlete eligibility and prohibiting schools from poaching a coach during the season.
The SEC-Big Ten statement came out less than 24 hours before a scheduled hearing about the bill in front of the Senate Commerce Committee. Cruz chairs the panel and Cantwell is the ranking Democrat.
The legislation has received support from the Big 12 and ACC, but the Big Ten and SEC, as the two richest leagues that also have decision-making power over the future of the College Football Playoff, hold the biggest cards.
One of the bill's key provisions would give conferences an option to pool their media rights, an idea the Big Ten and SEC have long claimed would not result in a financial windfall that proponents suggest. The leagues' statement did not speak to that issue.
A spokesperson for the Commerce Committee acknowledged the Big Ten-SEC position.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
The NFL, its union and the National Basketball Players Association on Tuesday sent statements to Congress supporting the Protect College Sports Act and lauding specific provisions it includes while also encouraging further "negotiations" during the legislative process. The NFL voiced its support for "the voluntary pooling of media rights under the Sports Broadcasting Act," which is something the SEC and Big Ten have opposed.
The professional voices lend credence to the bill at a critical time, as the Senate commerce committee is expected to vote on it following a markup on Thursday. Before the legislation goes to the Senate floor for a vote, the commerce committee has to advance the bill. Thursday's markup gives the committee members an opportunity to offer amendments to it before they vote.
"Healthy, stable, and thriving collegiate athletics is essential to the future of American sports, including Olympic sports, and this legislation is an important step to achieving that for the benefit of all college athletes and institutions alike," the NFL's statement read, according to a copy obtained by ESPN. "By utilizing proven models like the voluntary pooling of media rights under the Sports Broadcasting Act, which supports broad, fan-friendly distribution of NFL games, this legislation will support college athletics and ensure fans will be able to access their favorite games across today's changing media landscape."
The bipartisan bill -- which was drafted by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, with Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash. -- would provide the NCAA with an antitrust exemption to enforce several rules that have been recently challenged in court, including limiting transfers and athlete eligibility and prohibiting schools from poaching a coach during the season.
The players' associations for the NFL and the NBA jointly stated: "the bill includes several important provisions designed to protect college athletes, including guaranteeing NIL rights and providing medical and healthcare benefits. We encourage continued meaningful stakeholder engagement and negotiations to further strengthen the bill as it moves through Congress to ensure college athletes are protected and empowered."
A majority of commerce committee members need to vote in favor of the bill for it to advance, which means 15 of the 28 committee members need to approve it, regardless of political party. (There are 15 Republicans and 13 Democrats in the group.)
The bill has received support from the Big 12 and the ACC. But earlier this month, the Big Ten and the SEC released a statement saying they did not support the last version of the bill because it left "critical issues unresolved," including not "meaningfully" preempting state laws with a federal one.
Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti and SEC commissioner Greg Sankey did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The NFL stated it "looks forward to continue working with Congressional leaders as this bill moves through the legislative process."
Ohio State is battling Miami and Oregon for Jett Harrison, mainly Oregon. NIL is said to be a bigger priority for him than it was for Marv Jr., which makes sense given that NIL was in its baby stage back then and Marv Jr. wasn’t as big a prospect as Jett is.
I still think Jett will be a Buckeye as long as the WR play doesn’t regress badly and we come reasonably close to what Oregon will offer him. I believe Marv Sr. just spent a week at Ohio State.
A couple notes on Brysen Wright and Jett Harrison from a USC insider, he says Jett is their #1 target in the class and they’re prepared to spend big to try and land him.
Said USC is not involved with Brysen Wright because he’s hyper focused on 3-4 schools right now. Didn’t name the schools but from reports it’s clearly Ohio State and Miami with Texas and Florida trailing way behind.
Said he doesn’t believe any school will be able to pay the price tag to land both, which makes sense.
Someone on the Ole Miss board said he has a friend who’s a Big 12 DC and a Baylor school alumni and the friend believes it’s always been Ohio State. Said each school is offering over 6 million throughout the course of his college career which matches what the poster on the Georgia board said who claimed to be extremely close to the situation.
The poster on the Georgia board said the only difference between the Ohio State and Tennessee offers are how much he would make in year one (1.25 mil as a Freshman at Ohio State compared to 1.75-2 mil at Tennessee.)
I had heard that Tenn's offer was $6M over 3yrs, but that included $2M from Adidas. Whereas ours was $3.5M over 3yrs, but they have some things in the works that would bump our offer up to between $5M - $5.5M, and that the Staff feels very confident they can seal the deal. Here's hoping DGG sees the total package long term, and becomes a Buckeye!
