Your previous thoughts led me to this. We only have 12 teams. There are 30 MLB teams. There is no way our 12 teams have 90 starters (top 3 on each team). So, the two game per week model would challenge more than using only 40% of MLB rosters. We could add 3 P slots and 3 H slots to each roster to accommodate. This still doesn’t even get us to 50% of MLB rosters. As it is, every third to fourth week,you are going to have your aces pitch twice in a week, which could also cause some luck/imbalance to a matchup.That would be a disasterSome teams have 4 and 3 game series in a week, some have a 3 and a 2 with 2 travel days. Then you have starting pitchers...your entire rotation could miss a weekend. I don't know how that would ever work.
That would be a disaster
Some teams have 4 and 3 game series in a week, some have a 3 and a 2 with 2 travel days. Then you have starting pitchers...your entire rotation could miss a weekend. I don't know how that would ever work.
Well when you're going with a 4th/5th starter strategy because you used all of your top picks on hitters that suck pond water drainage like me...at least getting to where guys actually pitched would have helped. I don't think I even got to the minimum innings in 4 days.i got my ass kicked... more games wouldn't have helped
