Mike80 said:

Ehh...you guys are worrying too much about what TCUN is gonna do rather than what Ohio State will do to TCUN.

They have a defense that is decent but it's not on the level it was last year, especially in the secondary. Ohio State has the receivers to exploit that.

Don't to stupid stuff like run into 8 man boxes. And if you run RPOs, make sure they are blocked properly. One thing that has entirely disappeared the past couple weeks is the RPO "key" screens. I want to say they've run it twice since the Ped State game. There's absolutely a reason for that and it's not because it wasn't working....

Ohio State has an offensive skill set to make teams have to prepare for everything. I'm convinced the "slow starts" everyone whines about is a product of Kelly figuring out what the defense is keying on given a few basic looks early on. Given the track record of the coach calling the plays and the results we've seen, I do sincerely hope the strategy I'm thinking is there is actually there, because it has been working very well.

Click to expand...

We need to take the ball first if the 3 and out is greater than a 50per cent probability. I’d rather get it out of the way before our opponent scores. I think it’s fugazi that the strategy is try different things rather than score.

BB73 said:

And on defense, commit to stopping the run like was done against Iowa. I‘m expecting a third LB to be used frequently, and wouldn’t be surprised at some occasional 5-man fronts. We need to prevent them from stringing together first downs with their running game, shortening the game, and wearing down the starting D-Line.

Click to expand...

I think so too. And I think you'll see Downs (primarily) playing a lot closer to the line this week with Ransom doing a lot of single high safety type stuff. Make them make you get out of it by passing well (which they can't do)...stuff like that.

bucknut11 said:

Pardon my ignorance, but how is defending NCAA champ Mendez ranked #2?

Click to expand...

National champ in front of him. I disagree too...

Mike80 said:

Ehh...you guys are worrying too much about what TCUN is gonna do rather than what Ohio State will do to TCUN.

They have a defense that is decent but it's not on the level it was last year, especially in the secondary. Ohio State has the receivers to exploit that.

Don't to stupid stuff like run into 8 man boxes. And if you run RPOs, make sure they are blocked properly. One thing that has entirely disappeared the past couple weeks is the RPO "key" screens. I want to say they've run it twice since the Ped State game. There's absolutely a reason for that and it's not because it wasn't working....

Ohio State has an offensive skill set to make teams have to prepare for everything. I'm convinced the "slow starts" everyone whines about is a product of Kelly figuring out what the defense is keying on given a few basic looks early on. Given the track record of the coach calling the plays and the results we've seen, I do sincerely hope the strategy I'm thinking is there is actually there, because it has been working very well.

Click to expand...

And on defense, commit to stopping the run like was done against Iowa. I‘m expecting a third LB to be used frequently, and wouldn’t be surprised at some occasional 5-man fronts. We need to prevent them from stringing together first downs with their running game, shortening the game, and wearing down the starting D-Line.

Ehh...you guys are worrying too much about what TCUN is gonna do rather than what Ohio State will do to TCUN.

They have a defense that is decent but it's not on the level it was last year, especially in the secondary. Ohio State has the receivers to exploit that.

Don't to stupid stuff like run into 8 man boxes. And if you run RPOs, make sure they are blocked properly. One thing that has entirely disappeared the past couple weeks is the RPO "key" screens. I want to say they've run it twice since the Ped State game. There's absolutely a reason for that and it's not because it wasn't working....

Ohio State has an offensive skill set to make teams have to prepare for everything. I'm convinced the "slow starts" everyone whines about is a product of Kelly figuring out what the defense is keying on given a few basic looks early on. Given the track record of the coach calling the plays and the results we've seen, I do sincerely hope the strategy I'm thinking is there is actually there, because it has been working very well.

Buckeneye said:

Starts in the trenches.

Up front against Grant, can't let him win. Good news is that he doesn't look great against Zone stretch. Gets reached one too many times. Downside is the rest of the weasel front flows and pursues quite well.

Can't let the big man eat like Harmon did in the Oregon game.


You've got The 'Shoe, you'll have the crowd noise. Be methodical, be patient, play field position, absolutely NO turnovers. Let these assholes blink first in a game of chicken, then capitalize on the mistakes and slowly squeeze the life out of them down the stretch.

This is already setting up like a nail biting, patient, war of attrition type Tresselball game.

I struggle to see many points being scored in the 1st half. But I need our corners to be ready to go. Can't help their terrible passing offense by giving them easy yards and cheap flags.

Click to expand...

IMO that’s the last thing you do vs a team like this who struggles to move the ball. You don’t want a nail biting war of attrition.

Come out and smack them in the damned face. Go up on them early 14-0 and they’ll force things which will lead to mistakes and then it’s downhill from there.

They’re the 70+ ranked defense against the pass so we have got to attack them down the field. They’re a good defense but we have matchups everywhere against them at the skill vs their back 7 (especially if Johnson doesn’t play which I have a hunch he will).

As long as we play a clean game with no turnovers and no cheap stupid penalties this shouldn’t be a game by the time the third quarter rolls around. The longer they’re in the game the worse it is for the buckeyes.

Start fast and force TCUN to do things they don’t want to do.

Thump said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

Folks, this is 56 minutes and 43 seconds well fucking spent. So many great memories in here.

And I hate to contradict Urban, but he said a couple of times last week that this year’s goal-line stand at the Pedsters was the “greatest goal-line stand in Ohio State history”. I believe that doesn’t give enough credit to what the Buckeyes did in The Game in 1972. There are a couple plays from those goal-line plays in 1972 in this glorious set of highlights. Do yourself a favor, find 56 minutes and watch all of this.

RB07OSU said:

Well if NIL is similar, Frye has put development on full display this year and in terms of PT, wide open competition at LT next year and to the point where I think Sanders could legit start as a true frosh at LT if he lives up to the hype. I think part of the battle is just getting the kid out of the south, but glad to hear we made a move.

Click to expand...

It also helps that Tenn has not looked very good against teams with a pulse. Its cute to see them drop 60pts on UTEP or Kent State but they're still not close to winning the SEC. He just watched an IOL(Jackson) who was essentially the 3rd string LT, start at OT and clear the way against the #5 team. While playing next to the 3rd string LG, and the backup OC.

1926Buckeyes said:

Had not heard of him but leading 9th and 2nd including 10th in the 60 yd dash across the whole country is wild. Looks like he could be a legit track athlete if he wanted to be.

Click to expand...

He could be, he plays against pretty good competition overall and everyone looks like they are in slow motion compared to Brown. Probably the fastest OH kid since Teddy Ball Game and that's no joke. Plus he is not just a straight-line speed guy, he has WR skills...needs development but the potential is off the charts.

RhodeIslandBuck said:

I'm expecting this to go somewhat similar to the Iowa game.

Click to expand...

Yeah pretty much right? Similar defense overall ranking wise (TCUN more explosive but Iowa more sound) but Iowa has at least an average offense.

TDunk said:

Tempo these assholes. Plus the CB's are meh. Their offense will run on us. Every team seems to run for yards. Plus our tackling is hit or miss.

Click to expand...

Every team runs on us? You’re mistaking getting run on from giving up yards to dedicate resources to stopping the pass.

Indiana found success late because who the hell runs the ball down 24? They were running into a light box and our back up defensive line. Who cares if they wanted to run the ball there. We gladly gave them numbers to allow them to run the clock out and lose the game. Other than that who else ran on us? Oregon had success but they have weapons at WR, a mobile veteran QB, and have a good OL.

This isn’t IU or Oregon who had good skill and good OLs with QBs who lead the country in efficiency.

This is an average QB on his best day, with a shit OL, and even worse skill out wide. They do not have the weapons to force us out of the box.

The team that TCUN is similar to we shut down (Iowa) until they again were running against our backups.

I think Jim Knowles knows that their walk on QB isn’t beating us down the field. So I expect a heavy emphasis on stopping the run and we will do that.

Besides if they run on us? We likely aren’t winning the game.

pnuts34 said:

From what I've read, the NIL package between Tenn and OSU is very close, "other factors" were why he chose Tenn. Could be early PT, could be development, etc, but things seem to have swung in OSU's direction


I like Porter's breakdown of HS talent. He seems to have a much better gauge of OH talent than anyone else. Especially since he actually goes to games.

Click to expand...

Well if NIL is similar, Frye has put development on full display this year and in terms of PT, wide open competition at LT next year and to the point where I think Sanders could legit start as a true frosh at LT if he lives up to the hype. I think part of the battle is just getting the kid out of the south, but glad to hear we made a move.

Kid reminds me of Ryan Williams that's playing at Bama.

This is the opportunity to end TSUN for the next decade. Beat them so bad that they lose all of the recruits they have left before the NCAA even wipes away the past 3 seasons from the record books. Go for 2 every time and hang a hundred.

RB07OSU said:

I know money is money...but that electric crowd and Frye showing he can develop OL had to at least be impactful. Also, spend what we can on this kid to make sure. Serious game changer. Hope there is traction here...

Click to expand...

From what I've read, the NIL package between Tenn and OSU is very close, "other factors" were why he chose Tenn. Could be early PT, could be development, etc, but things seem to have swung in OSU's direction

Tanner said:

I miss Wiltfong on Bucknuts. I like him more than Mark Porter

Click to expand...

I like Porter's breakdown of HS talent. He seems to have a much better gauge of OH talent than anyone else. Especially since he actually goes to games.

I'm expecting this to go somewhat similar to the Iowa game.