@Mike80 , can you help us out, bro? I'm happy to help if needed.

I remember watching this happen, crazy days

Login to view embedded media

RugbyBuck said:

Pierce quoted yesterday:

• On his personal play: "I feel like I've done pretty well within our scheme. I don't think a lot of people really understand exactly what we're asked to do, so I don't really take much consideration of what they have to say. So it's like I'm just doing what (Matt Patricia) wants me to do, and I feel like I've done a good job. I've graded out a champion multiple weeks in a row. So that's ultimately all I can do."

Click to expand...

That’s what I wanted MP is happy so am I. I’d be happier with more sacks interceptions and tackles for loss. He’s reaching his peak which is all anyone can ask.

Pierce quoted yesterday:

• On his personal play: "I feel like I've done pretty well within our scheme. I don't think a lot of people really understand exactly what we're asked to do, so I don't really take much consideration of what they have to say. So it's like I'm just doing what (Matt Patricia) wants me to do, and I feel like I've done a good job. I've graded out a champion multiple weeks in a row. So that's ultimately all I can do."

RugbyBuck said:

I'm giving Hankton some credit for this. I don't think these guys get this run last year. That was one of my two issues with Hartline as WR coach; no minutes early in the season, if at all, and no rotation. I'm a fan so far.

Click to expand...

100% agreed.

Tanner said:

Agree with what everyone is saying. Henry could have come in like a diva but he hasn't. He blocks his ass off and the fact that he is playing shows he is handling his business in practice and off the field.

Click to expand...

this. him and boyd both block very well

Thump said:

Your conversation seems to be OVERWHELMINGLY one-sided, hence the comment.

Click to expand...

My conversation is "How do we know Arthur Smith is the reason why we're scoring with seconds to go at the end of each half?"

If you want to assume something that I'm not asking, that's on you....not me. I want this to be a good hire. I want to like the guy. I want to be wrong like I was about Patricia. So I ask a question. And I get a bunch of bullshit in response.

Since you've decided you're the arbiter of how this conversation is going, I thought you'd like all the info.

charlohiottean said:

I am here to be that guy:

True Origin: 19th-Century Horse Racing

• Ringer: In late 19th-century American horse racing, a "ringer" was a dishonest practice where a fast, high-quality horse was deceptively substituted for a slower one under a false name or pedigree to trick bookmakers and win bets. The term "ringer" itself may have evolved from older criminal and sports slang like "ringing the changes," which meant swapping a valuable item for a cheap one.
• Dead: In this context, "dead" is an intensifier meaning "exact" or "precise" (similar to phrases like "dead center" or "dead on").
• Timeline: The word "ringer" for a substituted horse appeared in print by 1882 (in the Manitoba Free Press), and the full phrase "dead ringer" appeared by 1888 (in the Oshkosh Weekly Times). It quickly expanded from horse racing to mean any striking resemblance or identical copy. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

Common False Origin (Urban Legend)

• The Graveyard Bell Myth: A popular folk etymology falsely claims the phrase comes from 18th- or 19th-century "safety coffins" fitted with bells or strings to rescue people who were accidentally buried alive. Language historians and etymologists have thoroughly debunked this story as an urban legend.[1, 2, 3, 4]

just sayin’

Click to expand...

I need you to provide a similar breakdown dispelling the myth that tomatoes do not belong in gumbo.

pnuts34 said:

Hearing that he's starting to trend towards Ped St...

Click to expand...

called it

buckeyebri said:

Still getting the Cloudflare security check every time in

Click to expand...

Ditto

BuckeyeNation27 said:

Or....instead of being condescending.....we could foster conversation and answer questions. Wild concept, I know.

Click to expand...

Your conversation seems to be OVERWHELMINGLY one-sided, hence the comment.

buckeyebri said:

@pnuts34 is there a difference maker out there still or fo you see that RB coming from the portal?

This seems to be the issue the last couple seasons is having that explosive back.

Click to expand...

Curious to hear @pnuts34 thoughts but I'm going to take a slightly different position than many and say that the RB position has been undervalued in recent years. Not just at the college level, but at the professional level too.

I get the observations that there are injuries so you need quantity, and that the talent disparity at RB is perhaps not as high as other positions where the talent is more scarce or where you need more numbers (OL/DL namely). However, a dynamic RB makes a world of difference to me. I'm not sure we win a title without Zeke, but also look what happened when Dobbins got injured and we had leaned on him so much all year before that. And recently our RBs are in the above average stratosphere, with Bo being a little above that at times. I agree not having a playmaker at RB has been a bit of a hindrance to the offense.

All that said, look out for Elijah Newman-Hall when he gets here, that kid is for real and will play from Day 1 imo. A big time RB in the portal would definitely be helpful, as would Bey coming along at the RB position. As to the topic matter of this thread for the 2027 class, I would qualify Tranard Roberts as an elite RB if we were to land him, that kid is for real.