Can we all agree on one thing?
The difference between discussing these things when they happen to
us versus when they happen to
them is
not that we choose to deny the fact that these things are reality, but that we choose to more succinctly inspect/dissect/reanalyze them in order to convince ourselves that they indeed must be true.
I hear a lot about hypocrisy, but what are we really talking about in regard to that? Are we talking about saying that the infractions, poor decisions and shady activity is okay because everyone is doing it? If that's the case, then I whole-heartedly agree, that's unacceptable. HOWEVER, if we're saying that it's hypocritical to hold a more skeptical, self-defensive stance when it comes to "us" than we do when it comes to "them" then I think that that's a much less heinous social crime.
We discuss a lot of things on this board, often times within very point to point logical arguments. I honestly don't believe that it's a conversational sin to hold a bit of a bias toward the reason the majority of us are even on these boards, The Ohio State University. The Buckeyes. Not to get overly preachy, but damn! Can't we all agree that what's going on fucking sucks and no matter how much we differ in our overall view on the situation that central theme is pretty non-negotiable?
Don't think less of me if I wan't to try and damper the psychological blow this whole ordeal is taking and is going to take over the next few years... and with all due respect, keep your desire to be "correct" away from the rest of our desires to be "okay". It's not about dismissal, or denial. It's very reasonable to be apologetic while still being rational. It's about one and one thing only:
Being. A. Fucking. Buckeye.