Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I would not think that you could get a much bigger name than Vrabel plus Luke would tend to be more defensive minded if he became HC. Don't know much about Johnson but it seems to do a good job with the DB's.jwinslow;1973979; said:Luke will hire his guys if given the chance in December.
Heacock, Tressel, Bollman are all on the verge of retirement.
Vrabel is an obvious holdover. I like both DB coaches, but he may want a bigger name, especially since he may have more room to open the pocket book. I doubt Fickell commands a huge salary even with a long contract.
cdiddy70;1973957; said:Which begets my next point. The timing of when that decision will be made.
Hopefully it is not any later than 12/1/11.
But given our feckless leadership, I posit they haven't set up a timeline, nor begun vetting potential candidates.
jwinslow;1973979; said:Luke will hire his guys if given the chance in December.
wadc45;1974425; said:I assume a lot of what Diddy is saying re: retention is based on the assumption that Luke keeps the job. If he does not you could see even some of the young assistants shown the door...Vrabel, Johnson, Hayes and especially Sis included.
I'm not sure if there is a magic wins number but anything double digits will make it difficult in the public eye to replace him. People have said 11 makes him a lock. I don't think there is any specific number that makes him a lock. I think it will be the caliber of the product he puts on the field and the development of the student athletes under his tutelage and the guidance of the other coaches. If OSU drops a few close ones but the team shows promise, academics are in order, the young players are developing under their position coaches, etc. I think that makes a stronger case for Luke's retention than a 12 win season where chaos reigns.
As far as a plan that Fickell needs to have in place to show a clear direction for the program, that will probably be something that would be discussed once the job is officially opened up to other candidates and Luke applies for the job the same as anyone else.
It's been said a million times before but I think it would have been easier to hire Luke as the full-time coach right out the gate and simply fired him if it wasn't working out after two years...rather than slap the interim tag on him, handcuff him and the whole staff with that label, and expect him to compete at the highest level while auditioning for his own job.
Just my thoughts...
RugbyBuck;1974483; said:It would be monumentally stupid because we need stability, actual and perceived, at the moment and making a wild play for the "used to be hot, but now starting the downhill slide chick who got divorced two years earlier and continues to troll the bars on the weekends" at 10:30 on a Saturday just makes us an insecure douche. We don't need Florida's trash. We are not MissState.