Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
See attached for OSU NIL guidelines. That is correct they can not use OSU logos or trademarks (even helmet award stickers & helmet stripes cannot be used) and they still can't sell their own stuff!I don't understand why I can't go to The Foundation website and buy official OSU gear... will the university not give them the rights to sell? I would pay extra if I knew 10% of my order was going to NIL....
doesn't the NCAA get a cut of official merch? would your idea cut into that?
See attached for OSU NIL guidelines. That is correct they can not use OSU logos or trademarks (even helmet award stickers & helmet stripes cannot be used) and they still can't sell their own stuff!
IMHO, the only way to make NIL "upfront" money work is this: Each player gets an annuity of a set dollar amount (say $1,000,000) held in his name. The annuity pays out when the player leaves the Ohio State football team, whether by running out of eligibility, entry into the NFL draft, transfer, injury, or otherwise.
Players would "earn" annuity money in a similar way to earning Buckeye leaf helmet stickers (green or black, doesn't matter). Annuity money would be earned based on individual performance (snap counts, stats, film grades, etc); team performance (total wins, beating scUM, winning B1G, etc), academics (class attendance, Academic All Big Ten, etc), and character (team captain, coach evaluations, etc).
It should be relatively difficult for a player to earn the entire $1,000,000 and it would probably require (at a minimum) a player staying all four (or five) years, being a multi-year All Big Ten selection, being an All American, being part of a multi-championship team, being a team captain, being a multi-year Academic All Big Ten selection, and not having any character issues.
Using the above model, a player could earn some annuity money even if he doesn't play much or at all (say Kamryn Babb) through team performance, academics, and character. Maybe have a minimum "good soldier" payment of say $250,000 for kids who are loyal to the program but for whatever reason just can't compete.
Any annuity money not earned by the player would be returned to the general fund.
A player could theoretically earn extra money beyond the $1,000,000 (taken from the general fund) by staying for four years and for outstanding achievements (All American, major award winner, etc) ... someone like James Laurinaitis comes to mind (3-time AA, Academic AA, Butkus, Nagurski, Lott).
If a player leaves the team early for any reason, then he forfeits any unearned annuity money, which would then be returned to the general fund (exceptions to full forfeiture could be made for "hardship" cases, like career-ending injuries). If a player transfers, then he also forfeits a percentage of his earned annuity money (say 30%) as a "restocking fee".
For the same reason that you shouldn't blow your entire paycheck every two weeks and should allocate some of it toward savings (your future).That is the equivalent of an incentive laden contract in the NFL.
If the other guy is offering you more money, sooner and guaranteed...why on earth would you take the OSU deal?
For the same reason that you shouldn't blow your entire paycheck every two weeks and should allocate some of it toward savings (your future).
It's not like an Ohio State player would be receiving nothing along the way - he'd get all the current benefits of a college scholarship and membership on the football, plus he'd still have the ability to earn NIL money on his own through endorsements, autograph signings, or whatever.
If I'm an employer (in this case, Ohio State football), I'm not giving guaranteed money to an employee (high school kid) who has zero track record. Some kids will buy into the long game, some kids won't ... and the kids who won't can go elsewhere regardless of how much talent/potential that they may possess. I'm not going to become Texas A+M just so I can "win" Signing Day.
In this case you might be able to get by. Not if you offered less though but by offering more but it being incentive laden. People might be willing to work for it if it's more beneficial to them long term even if it's short term less.I hear you on your philosophy of compensation and in a vacuum I don't necessarily disagree with it. The problem is your ability to attract & retain talent is always relative to your offering in the open market and paying less, later just isn't going to give you the ability to compete.
Isn't this similar to what they currently have?For the same reason that you shouldn't blow your entire paycheck every two weeks and should allocate some of it toward savings (your future).
It's not like an Ohio State player would be receiving nothing along the way - he'd get all the current benefits of a college scholarship and membership on the football, plus he'd still have the ability to earn NIL money on his own through endorsements, autograph signings, or whatever.
If I'm an employer (in this case, Ohio State football), I'm not giving guaranteed money to an employee (high school kid) who has zero track record. Some kids will buy into the long game, some kids won't ... and the kids who won't can go elsewhere regardless of how much talent/potential that they may possess. I'm not going to become Texas A+M just so I can "win" Signing Day.
In this case you might be able to get by. Not if you offered less though but by offering more but it being incentive laden. People might be willing to work for it if it's more beneficial to them long term even if it's short term less.
But yeah less money and incentive laden isn't going to go over well
And if the SEC is buying players who will never play for them (because they transfer after one year or get into off-the-field trouble), then how is that pay-for-play scheme giving those schools a competitive advantage over Ohio State?I think the issue OSU is, the SEC schools are throwing big money right out of the get go. Especially the areas OSU really needs filled this year.
And if the SEC is buying players who will never play for them (because they transfer after one year or get into off-the-field trouble), then how is that pay-for-play scheme giving those schools a competitive advantage over Ohio State?
There's a huge difference between what you can buy and what you can keep.
I don't know if the university is per se, or their outside interests are willing to give large sums of money for a commitment.And if the SEC is buying players who will never play for them (because they transfer after one year or get into off-the-field trouble), then how is that pay-for-play scheme giving those schools a competitive advantage over Ohio State?
There's a huge difference between what you can buy and what you can keep.