southcampus;2217287; said:Imagine if we got Mitchell, Bell, Quick....
A finish like that, plus Gibson, Worley and Lewis should place us in the top 5. I wonder if that would be enough to overcome scUM's recruiting class
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
southcampus;2217287; said:Imagine if we got Mitchell, Bell, Quick....
I love those 5 but we really, really need an OT.pnuts34;2217300; said:A finish like that, plus Gibson, Worley and Lewis should place us in the top 5. I wonder if that would be enough to overcome scUM's recruiting class
ShowMeBuck;2217390; said:I love those 5 but we really, really need an OT.
pnuts34;2217706; said:I do as well, but who is still realistically on our radar as of now? I thought we would pick up a few in the 2014 class instead
rampageripster;2217778; said:Yes we need OL depth... but does the staff want to spend a schollie on someone they aren't sold on just to fill a need, or use that schollie to get someone who they really want... I say that unless Johnson wants in, we move on from OL this year and focus on next year. Spend the energy and time on the 2014 OLinemen that the staff really want.
And I would partially agree with this. Not sure how anyone can argue that OL is the thinnest TODAY but LB is right there too. O'connor is hurt isn't he? Decker can play today but isn't a starter, neither is Dodson. I think LB is also very thin. Not coincidentally both OL and LB have failed to impress me so far. Safety is probably the 3rd thinnest poistion group and has also been pretty suspect this year. Funny how depth and performance seem to run together. So just give me Johnson, Mitchell and Bell and I will be nice and comfy Seriously, those 3 with Lewis, Gibson and either Quick or Foster would be an absolutely sick finish.MaxBuck;2217803; said:I think linebacker is our weakest position currently.