• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

The Polls (AP, Coaches, & CFP, etc.)

Almost wins against the consensus Number 1 team in the country should count less negatively than losing badly to a Purdue. Or to an LSU by 20 (in the Mutts's case). That is common sense. Conference ID should not be a factor, to be sure.
That’s the issue. UGA wasn’t punished at all for losing by 20 to LSU. They dropped from 2 to 8. The SEC is held to a completely different standard than any other conference in college football because the only thing they do is cannibalize each other since they’re too busy playing SE Louisiana, Rice, Citadel, Furman, Austin Peay, etc in the non conference.

Big Ten teams never heard the end of it when they scheduled FCS teams in the past.
 
Upvote 0
Just not a fan of how bad losses carry more weight with the committee than big wins--it rewards all the wrong kinds of behavior.

The question I'm wondering is whether Georgia got the pat on the back from the committee given that #5 vs. #6 is meaningless, or whether they really would've given Georgia the last spot if, say, ND had lost to USC in the season finale. if the answer to that is yes, then the committee should just be disbanded right now--a non-conference champ with two losses should never get in over a conference champ with only one loss, especially when that conference champ has better wins. That Georgia was ranked #5 and OSU ranked #6 is shameful enough--a lot of egg on the committee's face today, IMO.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top