ScriptOhio
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
Ex-CFP chair Gary Barta: Repeal NCAA's one-time transfer exception to slow NIL-fueled player movement
Barta, Iowa's athletic director, called NIL 'a good thing' but said it was being used for recruiting
Former College Football Playoff chair Gary Barta believes he has a solution for the quickly ballooning name, image and likeness market, which has the NCAA and its member institutions scrambling for guardrails nearly a year after its inception. Barta, Iowa's athletic director, suggested on the "Fight for Iowa" podcast Thursday that repealing the NCAA's one-time transfer policy would slow a feverish transfer market fueled by booster collectives disguising pay-for-play deals as NIL.
Enacted a year ago, the policy allows undergraduates to transfer one time while maintaining immediate eligibility.
"The transfers -- again, allowing a student transfer without having to sit a year -- if it wasn't for NIL, it's a good move ... a good idea," said Barta. "Now, when you combine it with NIL, it has just become what many have called it: the 'Wild, Wild, West.' One idea ... and I'm pursuing this and throwing it out [there] is, if we can't totally control NIL, then let's go back and put a one-year [sit]. If you transfer, you don't have to lose your scholarship, but you must sit out a year. Because we can control that. And that I think [it] would slow down the NIL deals because a booster isn't going to offer a student-athlete a big sum of money if they know they come to their university and have to sit out a year."
Unlike others in his position, Barta called NIL "a good thing ... but what has happened is it is now being used for recruiting inducements. That was never intended. It still is against the rules, but it's blatantly being abused."
Entire article: https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...exception-to-slow-nil-fueled-player-movement/
I really can't see that happening. It's not fair to penalize the player that has a good reason (i.e. other than NIL money) for transferring just because the NCAA/Conferences/schools can't police their booster's NIL activities.
Barta, Iowa's athletic director, called NIL 'a good thing' but said it was being used for recruiting
Former College Football Playoff chair Gary Barta believes he has a solution for the quickly ballooning name, image and likeness market, which has the NCAA and its member institutions scrambling for guardrails nearly a year after its inception. Barta, Iowa's athletic director, suggested on the "Fight for Iowa" podcast Thursday that repealing the NCAA's one-time transfer policy would slow a feverish transfer market fueled by booster collectives disguising pay-for-play deals as NIL.
Enacted a year ago, the policy allows undergraduates to transfer one time while maintaining immediate eligibility.
"The transfers -- again, allowing a student transfer without having to sit a year -- if it wasn't for NIL, it's a good move ... a good idea," said Barta. "Now, when you combine it with NIL, it has just become what many have called it: the 'Wild, Wild, West.' One idea ... and I'm pursuing this and throwing it out [there] is, if we can't totally control NIL, then let's go back and put a one-year [sit]. If you transfer, you don't have to lose your scholarship, but you must sit out a year. Because we can control that. And that I think [it] would slow down the NIL deals because a booster isn't going to offer a student-athlete a big sum of money if they know they come to their university and have to sit out a year."
Unlike others in his position, Barta called NIL "a good thing ... but what has happened is it is now being used for recruiting inducements. That was never intended. It still is against the rules, but it's blatantly being abused."
Entire article: https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...exception-to-slow-nil-fueled-player-movement/
I really can't see that happening. It's not fair to penalize the player that has a good reason (i.e. other than NIL money) for transferring just because the NCAA/Conferences/schools can't police their booster's NIL activities.
Upvote
0