Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Judge Claudia Wilken declined to grant preliminary approval to the House v. NCAA antitrust settlement Thursday. She said she was concerned with multiple parts of the terms of the deal. Chief among her worries was a clause that would require any money boosters provide to athletes to be for a "valid business purpose."
During the past several years, booster collectives have evolved to provide payments to athletes that on paper are payments for the use of the player's name, image and likeness but in practice have served as de facto salaries. The settlement terms would make it easier for the NCAA to eliminate those payments.
"What are we going to do with this?" Wilken asked. "I found that taking things away from people is usually not too popular."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/ot...hase-in-atlanta/ar-AA1s7twV?ocid=BingNewsSerp
No matter what you think of NIL. One has to admit that it's cool to see someone so young have the foresight to make an investment like this as opposed to just recklessly spending on cars, jewelry, clothes, etc. Seeing some kids start Non profit programs, purchase property, buy their family homes, and now this investment. I have to commend some of these young adults for their intelligent spending for their future and not just live up the stereotype of being young and dumb
I honestly have no clue. But like almost all news, the negative stories will get more publicized than the positive ones. That's why I like posting the positive ones when I can(especially from Buckeyes. But I'm a little biased)I wholeheartedly agree. What is the ratio spending it on dumb shit vs this young lady?