Ho hum. Another "journalist" citing incomplete facts from CNN as the basis of his opinion. I'll wait until the facts are out before I "rush to judgment".
Again this seems to be the consensus response over there - completely ignoring the subtext of the article. This is from someone who is close to the program. Someone who had been hearing rumors for some time. Someone who was not surprised to hear that Joe was more involved. Someone who was waiting for a report like that from CNN not because they wanted to torpedo the program, but because they were waiting for someone to substantiate what they already believed to be the case.
To be sure, this reporter could be wrong. CNN could be wrong. We could all be wrong.
But we aren't.
Upvote
0