Okinawa's#1Buck
Heisman
Dublin Buckeyes;692739; said:
That wouldn't help. If they were the only 2 teams playing they'd have a combined win % of .500 which would decrease their actual win %.
Upvote
0
-
New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.
- Thread starter brutus2002
- Start date
That wouldn't help. If they were the only 2 teams playing they'd have a combined win % of .500 which would decrease their actual win %.
OregonBuckeye
Semper Fi Buckeyes
ant80;692949; said:
I think it is you who is missing the point. He was being sarcastic.
Upvote
0
Bucknut200230
Newbie
Why the change in data?
I was wondering why there is now a big change in the data and the ranking since the thread began? I just looked it up and this is what it came up with.
1 Michigan 0.74533 860 282 36 1178
2 Notre Dame 0.74382 821 269 42 1132
3 Texas 0.71756 813 310 33 1156
4 Ohio State 0.71228 786 302 52 1140
5 Oklahoma 0.70995 758 294 53 1105
I was wondering why there is now a big change in the data and the ranking since the thread began? I just looked it up and this is what it came up with.
1 Michigan 0.74533 860 282 36 1178
2 Notre Dame 0.74382 821 269 42 1132
3 Texas 0.71756 813 310 33 1156
4 Ohio State 0.71228 786 302 52 1140
5 Oklahoma 0.70995 758 294 53 1105
Upvote
0
Bucknut200230;898987; said:
According to CFBwarehouse's Division I-A All-Time Winning Percentage page, we're still #3 (barely):
1. Michigan 860-284-38 (.744)
2. Notre Dame 821-270-41 (.743)
3. Ohio State 788-301-53 (.713)
4. Texas 810-316-34 (.713)
5. Oklahoma 765-295-53 (.711)
Upvote
0
MililaniBuckeye;898992; said:
CFBwarehouse and Stassen give slightly different numbers; possibly because Stassen does not include data from years when a program was not considered I-A, and possibly because Stassen looks at every school's records for the score of every game. Where there are discrepancies they delve deeper until they find out the true story, or at least the most likely story.
THIS PAGE shows how they arrived at their numbers for OSU's record.
For those who really give a rip, I can make the raw Excel file available.
Upvote
0
MililaniBuckeye;898992; said:
Hmm ...
When Mili posted the update at the end of the last regular season, we had:
Dec 20, 2006: Michigan 859-282-36 (.745)
now it's:
Aug 08, 2007: Michigan 860-284-38 (.744)
Amazing! Michigan went 1-2-2 this past spring?!
Upvote
0
Dryden;899436; said:Hmm ...
When Mili posted the update at the end of the last regular season, we had:
Dec 20, 2006: Michigan 859-282-36 (.745)
now it's:
Aug 08, 2007: Michigan 860-284-38 (.744)
Amazing! Michigan went 1-2-2 this past spring?!
They were 1-1-2 in the spring. The other loss was the Rose Bowl.
Upvote
0
Bucknut200230
Newbie
Good enough for me. I have seen different all-time records before. As someone else said though, someone would have to do some major research to disprove that. In the past, I compiled all the game scores for a local high school and had to go back to the 1920s for that, and I know how difficult that was. I can't imagine how difficult it would be to come up with a 100% positive record unless the records were really impeccable.
MililaniBuckeye;898992; said:
Upvote
0
Using CFBDataWarehouse's stats and updated with results as of 8:00 pm EST today (note Oklahoma plays tonight and Texas has a bye week):
1. Michigan ..... 868-288-38 (.743)
2. Notre Dame ... 823-279-41 (.738)
3. Ohio State ... 798-302-53 (.715)
4. Texas ........ 819-318-34 (.714) (bye this week)
5. Oklahoma ..... 774-296-53 (.713) (plays tonight)
1. Michigan ..... 868-288-38 (.743)
2. Notre Dame ... 823-279-41 (.738)
3. Ohio State ... 798-302-53 (.715)
4. Texas ........ 819-318-34 (.714) (bye this week)
5. Oklahoma ..... 774-296-53 (.713) (plays tonight)
Upvote
0
Bill Lucas
Assistant Coach
Shouldn't we be at 799 wins now? If we were at 788 in August and we've won 11 since it should be 799.
Upvote
0