utgrad73;1933620; said:
He took a bullet in the vest for the school. I feel that the coach cares so much about Ohio State that he would resign to allow the school to move on. Is it just me who thinks the AD knew as well as others, just speculating and will wait for the truth to be known. This thing doesn't smell right...
daddyphatsacs;1933817; said:
Agreed 100%. I've thought that all along as well. This whole ordeal still [censored]es me off, because I feel that Tress did take the bullet here.
"Take the bullet" means what? That he is engaging in more NCAA violations by withholding information about wrong doing in compliance or admin? I don't get this line of thought, even though it has been a pretty popular opinion here. Coach Tressel had a duty to report wrong doing in the program, no matter if a student or an AD. He obviously failed to do that with the tat-5 cover up. For Coach Tressel to "take the bullet" of necessity has to mean that Tress was covering for somebody who would get in even
more trouble if their role was known. If true, and I personally don't accept that it is, then Coach Tressel would be engaged in even
more improper behavior and violations than has been admitted, and covering up for others in the program who have also violated NCAA rules - people who would subject you to LOIC charges.
I mean, feel free to think it, but if you accept that view you have to launch the one that says your program and former coach were dedicated to doing the right thing, absent one significant error, and replace it with one that has the program committing major violations, Coach Tressel committing major violations, and Coach Tressel and the program conspiring to commit even
more major violations - at least running an intentionally deceptive press conference in March * to cover up detection of the worse program violations.
( * as opposed to the intentionally deceptive December press conference).
I just don't buy the second theory that he did more bad stuff in taking a bullet for the program. If he did, his ethics come into serious question to anyone who is not a Buckeye fan, as the factual predicate of the "take a bullet" theory at its core requires that Tress conspire to defraud the NCAA by covering up other tOSU major program violations.
Can't he just be an otherwise good man who made one uncharacteristically bad decision?