holybuckeye33
Hall of Fame
Wingate1217;2334408; said:Question for the board and especially the attorneys on here. I just found out from my daughter that the HOA has not placed a lien on the house. Probably because he has no proof and it wouldn't hold up in court. He sent a letter to our real estate management attorney's office just detailing what happened but no proof of a certified letter, no proof of a hearing, etc.
I asked my daughter since there is no lien then why don't they just close on the house. She states that the reaestate management attorney will not close because they "can't in good conscience knowing that $ may be owned to an outside agency."
I say close on the sale of the house and what recourse does the guy have without the lien? He can't put a lien on the house after the closing because the new owners didn't cause the dispute.
Our attorney is saying to pay the guy and then countersue him after the fact to get the money back....
I think that is BS and they should just close on the sale....
What do you attorneys think????
Let me preface this by saying the following is based upon the procedures in a state that is not North Carolina. I have no idea whether North Carolina is the same or different, so don't take this to the bank. Typically, a closing agent (in this case the real estate management attorney) does not represent the seller. Their job is to make sure that the seller conveys clear title to the property to the buyer (in this case your son's company) and to facilitate the transaction. Typically the seller is on their own to find their own counsel to prepare the deed and represent them in the transaction. There could be a duel representation agreement if both sides agree that there ultimately may be a conflict with the closing agent doing title work and issuing title insurance on behalf of the buyer while at the same time preparing the deed on behalf of the seller and agree to waive that conflict.
If I'm the closing agent on this transaction, there's no way that I'm closing and conveying title to the buyer knowing that this pending action is out there. I would ask for a letter from the HOA (not just the President) signed by at least 2 members of the board stating the violations set forth and the amount owed. I would then escrow that amount plus maybe 10-15% and close. This protects the new buyer in the event the HOA moves forward and does obtain a judgment for the amount claimed. If the HOA doesn't move forward with an action, your daughter and son-in-law should move forward with an action before the local magistrate (or NC equivalent if there is one) against the HOA. Once a determination is made either way then the closing company can release the escrowed funds to whomever they should be paid. No way in hell am I paying this money directly to this jackass and then hoping to get it back. As long as it's in escrow it's still technically your daughter's money, just subject to a potential claim by the HOA.
Unfortunately, I sincerely doubt you'll receive any personal judgment against the president for being a pain in the ass. Essentially you would have to show that your daughter suffered actual damages as a result of this cat (I just used cat here because my daughter has been asking me since I started typing this whether I need help typing cat). If your daughter wasn't selling to your son-in-laws company and a buyer walked away from a signed agreement of sale claiming your daughter couldn't convey clear title and she had to sell less to someone else, then you'd have actual damages and may be able to go after punitives also, but that would most likely need to be against the HOA and the jackass would probably be personally unaccountable to your daughter. Now the HOA may go after him for exceeding his authority and acting without authority, but that would be a different story.
Upvote
0