Wingate1217;2334408; said:Question for the board and especially the attorneys on here. I just found out from my daughter that the HOA has not placed a lien on the house. Probably because he has no proof and it wouldn't hold up in court. He sent a letter to our real estate management attorney's office just detailing what happened but no proof of a certified letter, no proof of a hearing, etc.
I asked my daughter since there is no lien then why don't they just close on the house. She states that the reaestate management attorney will not close because they "can't in good conscience knowing that $ may be owned to an outside agency."
I say close on the sale of the house and what recourse does the guy have without the lien? He can't put a lien on the house after the closing because the new owners didn't cause the dispute.
Our attorney is saying to pay the guy and then countersue him after the fact to get the money back....
I think that is BS and they should just close on the sale....
What do you attorneys think????
I'm just some dumb IT grunt, but you have to remember that the Real Estate Attorney works for your daughter ultimately. If he won't close the deal, find someone who will. The HOA has zero evidence, no certified letter, no hearing and no standing. If the RE Lawyer wants to bitch out, let him. There are others.
Upvote
0