• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

"Clean" College Athletic Programs

alexhortdog95;1928222; said:
OH.
MY.
GAWD.

Thanks. You just took what little innocense I had left :biggrin:.

That being said - Nebraska still does not meet the definition of the 'Fulmer Cup'. To do that, the entire team would have to get on a bus, go to Hastings, kill the entire population there (of 70, lol), get back on said bus, drive to Omaha, drag a bunch of ladies down the stairs by their hair WHILE running over kids with cars.

Wow, you make it sound like I linked you to "Two Huskers, One Cup". :biggrin:

The criterion was that there was a history of student athletes getting in trouble with the law, and gaining Fulmer Cup points. Yup, UNL's may be minor, but they're still there... we can't all by Auburn, right?
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1928220; said:
Texas high schools are shady as hell. There's no way Austin is clean.
Of course Texas football players receive perks. I would feel extremely confident in speculating that that goes on everywhere. If the requirement for program cleanliness is that athletes don't receive disallowed perks, there won't be a single school that qualifies as "clean". That's why I (and I think the original questioner) was only considering findings by the NCAA of major violations (as opposed to behind-closed-doors-perks) as being a mark of uncleanliness.
 
Upvote 0
zincfinger;1928236; said:
Of course Texas football players receive perks.

Ah, yes. Texas high school football perks.

minka-kelly-as-lyla-garrity.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Of course Texas football players receive perks. I would feel extremely confident in speculating that that goes on everywhere. If the requirement for program cleanliness is that athletes don't receive disallowed perks, there won't be a single school that qualifies as "clean". That's why I (and I think the original questioner) was only considering findings by the NCAA of major violations (as opposed to behind-closed-doors-perks) as being a mark of uncleanliness.
Well that's all this Ohio State mess is. So is the real question, who can hide their perks better?

I wouldn't care about any of this tattoo/cars/whatever else bullshit if it meant it would clean up the sport. Instead it's "Ohio State is dirty!!!! Fuck them!!!!" from fans of schools who cheat just as much.
 
Upvote 0
MaliBuckeye;1928239; said:
Ah, yes. Texas high school football perks.
I realize that's just a "for fun" response, but just to be clear, I was referring to perks for UTx football players, not perks for Texas high school players. And along those lines, I think you basically have to restrict this discussion of violations to those Universities that have actually been found guilty of major violations by the NCAA. Because if you're going to consider the question of what schools have athletes who get disallowed compensation for being part of the program, I think this quote from bassbuckeye's link is correct:

bassbuckeye07's link;1928238; said:
Sure, your school may not have been caught lately, but that?s probably because the coaches and boosters do it more discreetly than others ? and kudos to them, because getting away with it isn?t always easy.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1928243; said:
Well that's all this Ohio State mess is. So is the real question, who can hide their perks better?

I wouldn't care about any of this tattoo/cars/whatever else bullshit if it meant it would clean up the sport. Instead it's "Ohio State is dirty!!!! Fuck them!!!!" from fans of schools who cheat just as much.

You forgot about the NCAA saying "We've caught you...well...you turned yourselves in. Now you must be punished severely so that in the future, other schools will hide their transgressions better."

What. A. Fucking. Joke.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1928243; said:
Well that's all this Ohio State mess is. So is the real question, who can hide their perks better?
I personally think that is the question to a very substantial extent. That being said, I think a reasonable minimal requirement is, if you're a University employee with responsibility for minimizing this stuff, don't personally do anything that explicitly violates the rules. Because if you do and it's found out, you brought upon yourself the forthcoming colonoscopy. This is where I say that Tressel/OSU, while being probably at worst run-of-the-mill on this stuff, still largely deserve what they get.
 
Upvote 0
I think you basically have to restrict this discussion of violations to those schools that have actually been found guilty of major violations by the NCAA.
Well that doesn't make much sense. Isn't the original question "what team can I root for that won't end up like USC or Ohio State?"

There isn't one. They all have people giving the football players things they aren't supposed to be getting. You better start rooting for the average teams at the D2 level if you want to make sure you're not rooting for a program that cheats like that.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1928258; said:
Well that doesn't make much sense. Isn't the original question "what team can I root for that won't end up like USC or Ohio State?"

There isn't one. They all have people giving the football players things they aren't supposed to be getting. You better start rooting for the average teams at the D2 level if you want to make sure you're not rooting for a program that cheats like that.

Pretty sure there have been people posting in these threads recently that have said they had first hand knowledge of freebies happening at the D3 level! :lol: Basically, if you want to root for a team that isn't gonna get in trouble...you have the L.A. Clippers.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1928258; said:
Well that doesn't make much sense. Isn't the original question "what team can I root for that won't end up like USC or Ohio State?"

There isn't one. They all have people giving the football players things they aren't supposed to be getting. You better start rooting for the average teams at the D2 level if you want to make sure you're not rooting for a program that cheats like that.
That's not how I read the original question. The original question laid out specific criteria. If you want to ask the alternate question; what school only has student/athletes who are true students that just happen to be athletically talented, and whose athletes do not get any formally disallowed benefits-around-town? You and I agree that the answer is probably "no one". Particularly if you throw in the extra requirement; which of these schools have money programs that are consistently successful. Maybe Davidson (from what I understand, their athletes don't get any admissions boost, but I'd still wager they get some preferential treatment from local businesses).
 
Upvote 0
BUCKYLE;1928261; said:
Pretty sure there have been people posting in these threads recently that have said they had first hand knowledge of freebies happening at the D3 level!

Raises hand...

jwinslow;1928264; said:
I'll echo that for the freaking NAIA, and not just football & basketball either.

NAIA is worse, since there's no national accountability per se. It's why so many are trying to get out.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top