• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments, etc.

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
cincibuck said:
From 2005 to 2024 - Michigan had 214 wins, 96 losses, so they played just a shade below 70%.

So I went to Staten and did the math. Michigan 2024 to 2005 won 69% of their game, USC 73%, Penn State 72%, Oregon 75%. I think it says more about Ohio State's record over the same time frame than anything else. So all four teams are relatively close with the possible exception of the Oregon. My point? Michigan is only "crap" in comparison to Ohio State's record over the same period.
Click to expand...
It's not in comparison to Ohio State. It's in comparison to what they think of themselves, and this phoney image they somehow still have. They shouldn't even be in the conversation of USC. That's like putting South Carolina and Georgia in the same conversation. Michigan is South Carolina. On a good day.
 
Upvote 0
cincibuck said:
From 2005 to 2024 - Michigan had 214 wins, 96 losses, so they played just a shade below 70%.

So I went to Staten and did the math. Michigan 2024 to 2005 won 69% of their game, USC 73%, Penn State 72%, Oregon 75%. I think it says more about Ohio State's record over the same time frame than anything else. So all four teams are relatively close with the possible exception of the Oregon. My point? Michigan is only "crap" in comparison to Ohio State's record over the same period.
Click to expand...

69% is not even close to elite in college football by any measure. That's about the average of 8-4 per regular season. It's not total crap but it's not high level program at all either. Anyone acting like they are some powerful force who's unpunishable or the conference will sink is hilarious
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top