• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

2025 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments, etc.

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
cincibuck said:
From 2005 to 2024 - Michigan had 214 wins, 96 losses, so they played just a shade below 70%.

So I went to Staten and did the math. Michigan 2024 to 2005 won 69% of their game, USC 73%, Penn State 72%, Oregon 75%. I think it says more about Ohio State's record over the same time frame than anything else. So all four teams are relatively close with the possible exception of the Oregon. My point? Michigan is only "crap" in comparison to Ohio State's record over the same period.
Click to expand...
It's not in comparison to Ohio State. It's in comparison to what they think of themselves, and this phoney image they somehow still have. They shouldn't even be in the conversation of USC. That's like putting South Carolina and Georgia in the same conversation. Michigan is South Carolina. On a good day.
 
Upvote 0
cincibuck said:
From 2005 to 2024 - Michigan had 214 wins, 96 losses, so they played just a shade below 70%.

So I went to Staten and did the math. Michigan 2024 to 2005 won 69% of their game, USC 73%, Penn State 72%, Oregon 75%. I think it says more about Ohio State's record over the same time frame than anything else. So all four teams are relatively close with the possible exception of the Oregon. My point? Michigan is only "crap" in comparison to Ohio State's record over the same period.
Click to expand...

69% is not even close to elite in college football by any measure. That's about the average of 8-4 per regular season. It's not total crap but it's not high level program at all either. Anyone acting like they are some powerful force who's unpunishable or the conference will sink is hilarious
 
Upvote 0
ScriptOhio said:


LEAK: NCAA Took Formal Step to Bolster Institutional Violation Against Michigan
And it’s those institutional-level violations where the hammer is.
By NCAA definition, that material evidence either: Strengthens a Level I institutional charge (very likely Failure to Monitor)or Reveals deeper, systemic noncompliance across the program.
Either way — Michigan’s defense took a major credibility hit in front of the very people who will decide their fate

Just sayin': I just hope that guy's post is factual/accurate
Click to expand...

I think the best case scenario here is that the new and material evidence which was brought forward came from Tennessee and shows that the fruits of the cheating scheme were used to kill UTs championship opportunity. The SEC would be hollering at the COI something to the effect of "BURN THOSE FUCKERS TO THE GROUND, PAWWWWWL!" Proof that the scheme was used to damage players/teams from other conferences purely to benefit shitagain's playoff path would erase whatever pity they could have weasled out of the COI from their main explanation - that they had to do it to overcome other B1G teams sharing shitagain's signals amongst each other.

That could also have added to the reasoning for Petite-E to write a softly- worded letter asking the COI to not go crazy on punishments beyond the higher end of the original framework. "They're already going to be basically dead. We really don't think you need to curb stomp them after that. Plus they owe us some money and they borrowed some hardware of ours - we need them alive to watch as we take it back. Please and thank you."
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top