Ok - that makes sense.
I looked at the Eastern District lineup - like 2/3rds of that group has either graduated or lectured at scUM as well
hey man I'm an IT guy....
Upvote
0
-
New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.
- Thread starter LordJeffBuck
- Start date
- Status
Captain Buckeye
Assistant Coach
Read through most…
Basically goes
Big: hey you broke the rules and cheated for 3 years.
Michigan: what? No we didn’t.
Big: um yes you did here’s the data.
Michigan: no we didn’t! Seriously prove it.
Big: what? Are you stupid we gave you the evidence?
Michigan: no you didn’t.
Big: seriously stfu did you even read it?
Michigan: no didn’t bother because we didn’t do anything wrong.
Big: ugh, wtf. I’m suspending your coach 3 games and good luck with the NCAA because they can provide all of it.
Michigan: stop picking on us!
Upvote
0
Zem
Hall of Fame
Tony appears to be very displease with tCun ("the University").If any of y'all haven't read the entire 13 page letter from Tony Pititti, here it is. They are FUCKED.
(PDF) - Big Ten Conference
bigten.org
"The University’s reading is simply incorrect."
Translation: You would think the University would have better reading comprehension skills.
Upvote
0
If coaches at CMU knew, there's no fucking way it wasn't common knowledge at scUM. Wonder if he reused an alias that can be traced to sideline passes given at other schools.
Upvote
0
Captain Buckeye
Assistant Coach
Which is weird because Michigan also stated they didn’t review the evidence either.
Yet somehow they’re fighting back with everything they have?
Only assumption I can make is somehow the university thinks they can’t be held responsible if they don’t know the details? But obviously there’s NCAA rules for that now and it leads to a lack of control issue which they wouldn’t want.
Overall, I really don’t get what would cause a university to not review the evidence that details what they’re alleged to have done. If they have reviewed then that might actually be worse. Because that means they were presented the details and thought “nah we didn’t do anything only Connor did”.
My guess is they looked at the evidence but just somehow think they can get around it by saying Connor did it all as an analyst. Somehow they aren’t grasping that they’re going to be responsible for Connor. Particularly with how many photos and videos there are of him in close communication with the staff during the games
Upvote
0
sg86
Heisman
If you are a member of the staff deemed important enough that you’re communicating audibles to Harbaugh and the coordinators on the sideline during games, there is a 0.0% chance you could just disappear for like 6 or 7 hours the night before the first game of the season without anyone knowing.
Upvote
0
- Status