I agree that the offense will continue to improve. Tater (if he can stay in one piece) looks like a very good QB. I'm still not sold on the WRs, but I do think Koger could end up being one of the best TEs in the country.zwem;1560883; said:Michigan has yet to land a true defensive tackle this year and that worries me a little bit. They aren't picking up any linebackers and it seems the top guys in the country are looking else where.
Michigan's offense should take off in the next two years but the defense just doesn't seem to be there.
The good news is that Ohio and Michigan are going to have a lot of good players in the class of 11. Maybe Michigan can go to Ohio and convince a few to come up north and lock up the good ones out of Michigan.
The thing is, even if the offense does take off, if you don't have at least a decent defense, there will be hiccups. They'll run into teams that can neutralize their offense. The defense just doesn't seem to be able to stop anybody outside of [censored]ty MAC teams. Even they get their yards. The DL depth is awful and he's not bringing in good enough talent to really alleviate that. I think Martin is a bull in the middle and Roh will be a player, but losing Graham next year is gonna hurt.
The LB play is still subpar and nothing really is coming in. As for the DBs, Warren looks better than last year, but still isn't becoming the shutdown guy most predicted. Cissoko looks completely overmatched. Turner may be a good one, but Warren may be gone before he's really ready. Safety play is still bad. I think Emilen and Robinson will eventually help there. But the front 7 looks bad with no real help on the horizon.
I don't know how far you can expect the offense to carry you. You can't win enough games in shootouts when you're in the Big Ten, especially when there will be physical defenses that can punch you in the mouth and neutralize that explosiveness.
Upvote
0