They won't announce that a mistake was made.
Also, were any bets paid out that would be different if WMU wins the game? Probably. I know the cheaters didn't cover, so if you took WMU plus the points, you won. But if you picked WMU straight up, you lost your money. If you picked the cheaters straight up, you already got your money. Can the gamblers get their money back?
The reason I ask is we know that the gamblers have a seat in the room. They may be sitting against the back, not talking in the open. But they're there. And they wanted the cheaters to win.
Not saying they were talking to the refs. But they're present for the meetings where it SHOULD come out that the refs made the mistake.
But that announcement will never be made.
Very few people would have taken WMU ML. That would be 'fuck you' money that sharps don't spend because, by the numbers, it's a fools errands. Almost nobody takes scUM ML because the risk isn't worth the payout.
scUM was a 28pt favorite. If you took WMU to cover, obviously you did. If you took scUM to cover, that last TD wouldn't have made a shit bit of difference.
Money can corrupt. But in this case, Vegas is the scape-goat and/or boogeyman. No money of note was changing hands unless some random ttun fan dropped thousands last second on a hail Mary. Possible, but I doubt it.
I can't speak to the live betting situation. But statistically it's far less used than 'standard' pre-game lines.
Anybody remember The Game, 02? Independent clock operator put one more second back on. It'll be interesting to see how this is any different.