Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A billionaire acknowledged on Tuesday that his widely read opinion column in The Wall Street Journal criticizing Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s bond market intervention was written using artificial intelligence.
Stanley Druckenmiller, a former hedge fund manager who founded Duquesne Capital, published “Let the Bond Market Speak” on Monday, questioning Bessent’s interventions to hold down yields on U.S. treasuries. The article drew added attention because Druckenmiller worked with Bessent under George Soros, and is sometimes described as a “mentor” to the treasury secretary.
Pangram, an AI detection tool, found that Druckenmiller’s op-ed had been written using artificial intelligence, according to multiple social media posts. In an interview with NOTUS, Druckenmiller said “of course I used AI” when writing the column, and argued he didn’t see a problem with doing so.
“There’s a reason I moved from an English major to being an economics major,” Druckenmiller said. “I’m not embarrassed by it … I write everything using AI now for the same reason I use a calculator when I do math problems.”
In a statement, Paul Gigot, the editorial page editor for The Wall Street Journal, defendedDruckenmiller.
“AI is a fact of modern life. People will use it to assist in their work and their writing, including with research, checking grammar, editing and more,” Gigot said. “The question for us is whether what we publish from contributors reflects an author’s original argument, and if the author has the standing and credibility to make it. In Stan Druckenmiller’s case, we have had a relationship with him for many years, and nobody can doubt that his op-ed is his genuine opinion.”
The use of AI by economists and other experts in writing opinion pieces has gained renewed scrutiny as the tool has become more widely used.
Earlier this month, Harvard professor Ricardo Hausmann published a column in the Financial Times about Trump’s tariff regime. The column appeared laced with AI-inflected language, and the Financial Times later appended a note saying: “It has come to our attention that AI was used to condense a longer draft of this column prior to submission to the FT and our own editorial involvement. The FT editorial code of conduct specifically prohibits the use of AI in the writing process.”
Druckenmiller’s op-ed also included numerous phrases that sound like writing generated by AI, including: “There is a quieter cost, too” and “This wasn’t liquidity management, it was price management.”
A Pangram test posted on social media by the economist Claudia Sahm found that “100 percent of this text is AI.” Druckenmiller denied that “the whole thing” was written with AI and said that he rejected many of the AI’s suggestions during the writing process.
Some media experts have expressed concern about the proliferation of the tool. Chris Roberts, an associate professor at the University of Alabama specializing in journalism ethics, said “using AI raises questions about how much time and thought actually went into the piece.”
“We see a ton of this. We’re going to see more of this,” Roberts said. “Any time you take humans out of the process of communicating to other humans there can be blowback when the words or the intent is wrong, or it doesn’t sound like a human.”
Druckenmiller dismissed the use of the tool as unimportant because the op-ed reflected his intended meaning.
“I don’t know why this is relevant,” Druckenmiller said. “My name is on the piece. It’s my message.”
See these around my neighborhood every so often. There was a group of three of them going down a side street one day and the fire chief pulled one over. I think he was trying to figure out what the hell it was.
Speaking of Northern Illinois, how are they now in the Mountain West while Sacramento State is in the Mid-American Conference?
That makes almost as much sense as Stanford and Cal being in the Atlantic Coast Conf.
lol
I’m not as convinced as you are about his hiring being a bad one, but there is a nice ring to “17 TE McGee”.

I’m not as convinced as you are about his hiring being a bad one, but there is a nice ring to “17 TE McGee”.
Someone has got her rocks off.Like my wife says when you show her a map: geology is hard
This tweet is mind numbingly stupid. We were already elite last year offensively. So bringing in a guy who sucked donkey balls in the NFL is what's going to take us to the "next level"? It'd be one thing if we were average...........we were THE level. There already isn't a next one to get to. Now that we've got 17 TE McGee over here, NOW we're going to be good? Fuck off.

Speaking of Northern Illinois, how are they now in the Mountain West while Sacramento State is in the Mid-American Conference?
That makes almost as much sense as Stanford and Cal being in the Atlantic Coast Conf.

FIFYIf Sayin was in the SECSECSEC McShay would be asking to fellate him on the 50 yard line…
Anything from Esecsecsecpn HAS BEEN SUSPECT FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS
Well, It’s a Small World.The act of thinking of songs to list as never want to hear again...makes you hear them again.
Why do that to yourself?