Headlines You Don't See Every Day (outside of Florida)
- By ochre
- Open Discussion (Work-safe)
- 2992 Replies
pretty sure, by definition, one can't have a private moment in public.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You prep like she suggests, you can have a lot of that which is undefeated for a lot longer. And while you're actually still an active star athlete, you don't need he bling to get it.Or...buy a Hellcat and a phatass chain, am I right? I know which way I would have went at 18-22 years old. Because "it" is undefeated.
Also believe we're seeing an aspect of recruiting, where the vultures hang out in the weeds (trees), and see how a football power is shaping up, and then review the commit list, and try to steal/cherry pick/woo away some of the lower rated commits with the offer of more NIL and/or playing time. Can see the recent DB defect in that category. Looking up and seeing three more highly ranked players at your same position, might tend to dull the tastes for that program, no matter what the DB coach might say/argue. tOSU is littered with 3*s that have worked/played their way to AA status, and first rounders in the NFL, and making millions there. Get that, got that. But the added incentive of NIL money now, might be the straw that breaks the camels back. Now on the other hand, the school (tOSU being of note), might lament the loss in the papers, but secretly pleased that a schollie opened up (along with NIL and university money distribution) to spend competing for another area of need/want. PS, not naive enough to not believe this has been a recruiting tactic since time out of mind, just becoming more prevalent nowadays.
I guess this is kind of the bare minimum I need to see to be satisfied (and it is harsh because FUCK THEIR CHEATING ASSES):I'll need to see the official penalties, but if they're getting him for 3 years of cheating, why only a 2 year postseason ban? Even if it got blown up mid-year 3, they still cheated in that season which had a direct impact on their results. Anything less than a 3 year postseason ban is some soft shit.
Larry Coker flamed out by year six. Ryan Day won a Natty in year six. i'm just saying.
I'll need to see the official penalties, but if they're getting him for 3 years of cheating, why only a 2 year postseason ban? Even if it got blown up mid-year 3, they still cheated in that season which had a direct impact on their results. Anything less than a 3 year postseason ban is some soft shit.Per Premierdrum on 11W late yesterday…
A UM-adjacent source, who helped us break both the draft and formal NOA delivery stories, had a bit to say.
Internally, this source says that UM is preparing for-
- "Record-correcting" rear facing sanctions
- A 2-year postseason ban
- Recruiting restrictions
- A 6 to as many as 12 game suspension and show-cause penalty for Moore
- Fines and other administrative penalties (trainings, enhanced monitoring, etc).
Seriously. I have seen several in this article though that have some high potential in RF, including Cleveland. I can see where teams might be trying to move CF to the corners but I can also see that failing as bad as trying to move 2B and 3B talentsThat’s an issue across MLB, not just these ass clowns.
That’s an issue across MLB, not just these ass clowns.And not a single corner outfielder amongst them.
The record correcting seems like fun but the rest of that seems pretty lightPer Premierdrum on 11W late yesterday…
A UM-adjacent source, who helped us break both the draft and formal NOA delivery stories, had a bit to say.
Internally, this source says that UM is preparing for-
- "Record-correcting" rear facing sanctions
- A 2-year postseason ban
- Recruiting restrictions
- A 6 to as many as 12 game suspension and show-cause penalty for Moore
- Fines and other administrative penalties (trainings, enhanced monitoring, etc).