I think its a bit too early as well.......was disappointed he didn't pull down an absolute dime from Sayin against Texas, but kid has shown flashes in the run game as a blocker and limited reps as a WR last year.
To add to that, Day has shown in the past he has the balls to play younger kids over more experienced players if they've earned it. So, I do think Iniss is earning this PT, and it's not like they're trying to be sensitive to him.
To the earlier point....we had Texas where the offense was extremely basic, and it's a bummer he dropped an explosive down the field. Grambling is basically a throw away game (no disrespect to them......many of our backups looked more explosive than the starters just based on flow of game). I'd make the argument if Iniss got backup WR reps against Grambling, we'd be talking about how explosive he looked....JMO.
