SEC (It just means more.. even its losses are wins)
- By jwinslow
- College Football
- 2757 Replies
I saw someone mention that Tulane was once an SEC team.Tulane not JMU
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I saw someone mention that Tulane was once an SEC team.Tulane not JMU
Miami doesn't have any weaknesses to exploit? That's weird. Louisville and SMU both managed to score more than 20 on the Canes, and I'm pretty sure they don't have six first round draft picks on both their rosters combined.That their weakness got exploited
From Ohio, family, etc… as long as the financial is in the ball park it’ll be enough imo.
It’s not a common approach. Not in the least.You needed Birm to tell you that? That’s not an interesting take whatsoever. It’s funny how everyone points to IU when Ole Miss is really the team that perfected this strategy. Ole Miss has 55 transfers on their roster. They have a QB that tore up mighty Georgia last night who played for D2 Ferris State last season.
Spoiler alert, it won't beFrom Ohio, family, etc… as long as the financial is in the ball park it’ll be enough imo.
Doesn't need to be an analyst. Can be full coach and teach on the field just can't go on the road and recruitI think from what I understand. We can hire our OC as an analyst.
They just wouldn’t be allowed in the road to recruit. What a perfect loophole for an NFL coordinator who has no want to recruit.
Yep need someone who if it's 52 we don't welp we're bonedNeed a guy who's going to be mostly reliable from <45 and has the mental fortitude not to shank chip shots in pressure situations.
Big bonus points for someone who you feel has got at least a 50% or more shot to hit from 50 plus if called upon. When's the last time we had a guy who even had near 50% confidence level from 50 or more?
Ohio State needs a kicker who can be effective under pressure. I personally would be looking for a new face.
I think what Indiana and Miami exposed though, is OSU may be more talented in nearly every position group, but all it takes is a defensive line to wreck the efficiency if the offensive line cannot hold up….and once they offensive line cannot hold up consistently, it dramatically effects our freshman QB even when his protection isn’t bad.
In this case, using tempo can help a weakness compared to the other team (our offensive line versus their defensive line), and maximize our talent at positions where we do have the advantage (go tempo so the defense plays a “base” coverage that allows our offense to exploit our advantages more easily).
I think where the argument to play as slow as Day is, fundamentally breaks down, is when we cannot execute because we just aren’t more talented in one facet of the game. I was rolling with it until Indiana made Swiss cheese of our o-line and then Miami basically did the same thing with stunts.
I guess, IMO, I’m not cutting my nose off in spite of my face…..I feel like Day let Indiana and Miami beat us with (1) position group….i guess (2) if you count special teams. But defensive lines wrecked our season. And you can gameplan around elite defensive lines…..we just didn’t for the most part.
It’s not the plays per game that I’m upset about. It’s more of using the entire play clock every time gives the defense time to get a breather, get a call in and lined up with adjustments. It can still take 7-8 minutes. They don’t have to do it all the time, just be more varied. The offense is so damn predictable in the play calling and the play speed. We only went fast a few times this year and it almost always put the defense on their heals. I don’t want them to go fast all the time. I don’t want the Mariotta Ducks speed. I just wish they would have done it 3-4 drives.I don't have a clean plays per game source so I looked at the box scores from last years playoff games and just added the pass attempts plus the rushing attempts. If that somehow misses any other plays then forgive me but here is what I found
Team: pass attempts/runs/total
Tenn: 31/33/64
Oregon:57 total plays, I had it backwards.
Texas: 33/24/57
ND: 21/41/62
60 plays per game
The average plays per game in '25 was 64 according to this site and if that's site data is correct, the overall plays per game in 2024 was 62.8.
So not so sure the sped things up from last playoffs narrative holds water. Also, if this data is correct, you guys who are arguing faster = success need to reconcile 2025 being a slightly faster year than 2024.
Unless all of this is way off, the tempo hasn't materially changed.
The outcome did.
EDIT
This site has it easier to find and lists plays per game.
I would also add they ran 59 plays against Miami and 56 against IU.
57.5 plays per game in 2025, against 60 plays per game in 2024 playoffs.
2 plays per game isn't the story folks.
You needed Birm to tell you that? That’s not an interesting take whatsoever. It’s funny how everyone points to IU when Ole Miss is really the team that perfected this strategy. Ole Miss has 55 transfers on their roster. They have a QB that tore up mighty Georgia last night who played for D2 Ferris State last season.He’s probably not getting that kind of money.
But Birm had an interesting take. He thought the way to go was to go get older 5th year guys who have done well at smaller schools.
He pointed out how Indiana is living off that and how he watched 23 year old dudes beat up on 18-19 year olds when they played Alabama.
I tend to agree with him. Go get the best player at a MAC school for example. Then go get the best player at a Mountain West school,
22 year guys who have seen it all and have produced enough.
That said I still think you go get a Koi Perich.