ORD_Buckeye
Wrong glass, Sir.
Oy, this is going in different directions and is not helped by the fact I'm multitasking--beer, wine, now over Sunday Night game, a video game and this forum...but...
Woody. It has taken me years to try and put this in perspective but it doesn't matter how long he was there, how little he was paid, how much he accomplished---he punched a kid (and on national tv). Yet, Clarett and the tatgate lads are the ones who were the real threat to the program? Bull[Mark May]. And my question--several pages ago--was did they lead Clarett to believe they were looking into options to get him back for the funeral? It really doesn't matter if he was a purported gangbanger. It does kind of matter if they spooned him a line of bull[Mark May] (with a MNC on the line and all).
I think what you're getting at is did the higher ups at the university (and by that I mean Geiger and above) enter into some Faustian bargain with Clarett and attempt to finesse the situation to get through the 02 season? Yes, I think they did and did wrongly IMO. I, however, also think at some point they came to the conclusion that they were mistaken in that tact and had inadvertently created a beast that they could no longer control and chose at that time (rightly IMO) to sever that beast from the university.
In my opinion, he should have been benched after the ESPN Magazine article and if not then, then certainly after the sideline tantrum with Spencer. That it was not nipped in the bud, I lay at the feet of Tressel. JT was his coach, and he was the first in line to have reigned the kid back under control. It was his abdication of responsibility that led to the problem being laid at Geiger's doorstep. By that time, it had spun out of control to a degree that the higher ups had to step in and were, at that point, trying to do damage control rather than proactively deal with a situation, which the head coach of the football team should have already dealt with.
As for comparing the MoC and the Tat-5 with Woody, it's a fundamental difference. Woody's actions were deeply embarrassing and justified his termination. They, however, did not call into question the football program's compliance with NCAA rules and the university's integrity. The actions of the Tat-5 and Tressel, however, did exactly that. That's the difference, and that's why Woody was welcomed back so quickly while the latter remain--and rightfully so--personas non grata.
Upvote
0