buckeyesin07;1886399; said:
Smoov--serious question: what do you think should come out of this w/r/t punishment? What would you like to see? Just asking, because (and maybe I'm unknowingly reading this into your posts) it seems like there's a certain slant to your posts (e.g., the bolded above, your repeated use of the phrase "another" big problem for OSU, etc.).
Gosh, 07, I don't know. That's beyond my pay scale. I am but a simple cave man designer.
I don't know if there is a 'slant' to my posts, I'm just honestly stating my opinion. But I do think this is another big body blow to the OSU perception and reputation, along with a significant ding on JT himself. After all, it
is the second time in just a few months that OSU has gotten into significant trouble.
I think it's common to all schools, but the perception within the fanbase of any particular program and coaches is always better - as long as we like them and they are winning at a satisfactory clip - than the perception of the college football landscape at large. The opposite is true if we don't like them and they aren't winning.
Allow me to illustrate by using Arkansas as an example: The college football world at large thinks (thought?) Houston Nutt is a fine man and a fine football coach, and were bewildered that the Arkansas fans wanted him gone so badly that they would resort to the tactics they used to drive him out.
Inside the Arkansas fanbase, the perception was (is) that he is a vainglorious, petty and dishonest man and a football coach who was (is) in over his head. A coach who was overly loyal to incompetent, sycophantic assistants. Arkansas fan was bewildered that the world at large couldn't see that.
The truth, as always, is somewhere in between. In football, and in life, no one is ever as good or as bad as their reputation says it is.
If we like our coach and they win, they are revered beyond what they actually deserve. If we don't like our coach and they aren't winning, they are reviled beyond what they actually deserve.
I say that to say this: The perception of OSU and Jim Tressel inside the Buckeye community doesn't line up with the perception of the college football world at large. Yes, he's a good man, a good teacher and a good coach, but probably not quite as good as y'all think he is.
The perception of OSU and Jim Tressell outside the Buckeye community is significantly different than what it is from the inside.
As far as what should happen, I have no real opinion on that, and the NCAA is such a huge mess of inconsistencies and contradictions, it's hard to get a grip on what
might happen. On top of that, there are still a lot of unknown facts about his particular issue.
Regardless, you'd have a hard time convincing me that JT didn't know better, or didn't know exactly what he was risking by failing to disclose what he knew.