The three specific times:
-- Tressel signed a document on Sept. 13, 2010 that said he was not aware of NCAA violations.
-- He failed to tell school officials on or around Dec. 9, 2010 about emails he received in April explaining players' involvement in selling memorabilia.
-- He failed to tell school officials about the emails - or his knowledge of players selling memorabilia -- when specifically asked on Dec. 16, 2010. He also misled school officials that day when stating he "did not recall from whom he received the tip," and that he "did not know that any items had been seized."
The letter states, "The institution is very surprised and disappointed in Coach Tressel's lack of action in this matter," but goes on to say that the violation is 'out of character' for Tressel and that he has a "proven history of promoting an atmosphere of NCAA compliance within the football program."
Another significant - and potentially more damning -- issue: In a Feb. 8, 2011 interview, Tressel admitted it was 'inevitable' that players named in the email had committed NCAA violations and would be ruled ineligible. In other words, Tressel knew the players were ineligible and played them anyway.
His reason at Tuesday night's press conference for playing them: He didn't want to interfere with a federal investigation. Either way, that admission jeopardizes any hope of Ohio State has of keeping its 12 victories from the 2010 season, and paves the way for more serious sanctions from the sport?s governing body.
That one statement - in conjunction with Tressel lying about the emails and misleading university investigators -- can be the foundation for lack of institutional control charges.
That charge is the most serious the NCAA can levy, and could result in probation, lost scholarships, and even vacating the entire 2010 season.