scott91575
Resident hater
jimotis4heisman;1484567; said:if you think any early 1980s car would pass todays emission standards youre joking yourself....
or safety standards, including meeting 5* ratings. Add in more electronics, some more motors for convenience features, etc. You add over 500 lbs to the vehicle.
I love conspiracy theories that this stuff is being kept away on purpose. Just have "idiot" tattooed on your forehead. It would save people the effort of listening to you.
I have said this before. I will say it again. I have worked for more than one auto company. I have been involved in R&D. There is nothing being held back from you that makes sense financially. Any company would kill to have some super advanced fuel economy saving engine, and would get it on the market as fast as possible. I have been involved in fuel savings measures where the company is willing to spend hundreds of millions for a few percentage increases in fuel economy. The only reason OEM's try to stop CAFE increases is some companies build a larger amount of low fuel economy vehicles...why? Because they were selling, and selling well. Again, why? Because the consumer wanted them. Then the government goes and forces CAFE on companies, and use zero knowledge into how to implement it. This puts companies at a disadvantage to other companies that sell cars in areas where fuel economy sells more.
Where is this super Chevy Citation these days? You actually believed that bull[censored]? Did you pump the gas yourself, or did your uncle come back and tell you it was only 3 gallons and it was full? That whole story is full of [censored]. First of all, a dealer would have no clue the vehicle was experimental. On top of that, it would also never get anywhere near a consumer. Finally, if the dealer did know it was experimental it would have been illegal to sell it or let a consumer keep it.
I love how people call the big 3 CEO's idiots, and yet on the other hand accuse them of a vast conspiracy that would take unimaginable genius.
Upvote
0