Buckeyevsworld
All-American
MililaniBuckeye;2221741; said:fify
I forgot about that one. lol So that means Florida will be mentioned too. Followed by the 07 NC clips.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
MililaniBuckeye;2221741; said:fify
southcampus;2221798; said:Unlike most times these teams meet, there won't be very many future NFL players on the offenses. Mainly because we don't have a lot of future NFL players on our offense like we usually do.
Buckeneye;2221793; said:We've never played Florida until last year... Im sticking with that.
I'm curious whether MSU is going to go with their usual offensive approach this game. We haven't had a chance to see it much yet, but I suspect the OSU defense will be reasonably good at defending an inside power rushing game. Is MSU going to stick with their bread & butter, and try to attack what is probably the strength of the OSU defense? Or are they going to go outside their comfort zone and try to exploit OSU's defensive weaknesses that have been apparent in the first four games? I think I hope it's the former.darbypitcher22;2221852; said:They may be content to deal with us trying to wind their D especially if they can slow the pace down and give the ball to Bell 50 times
zincfinger;2221859; said:I'm curious whether MSU is going to go with their usual offensive approach this game. We haven't had a chance to see it much yet, but I suspect the OSU defense will be reasonably good at defending an inside power rushing game. Is MSU going to stick with their bread & butter, and try to attack what is probably the strength of the OSU defense? Or are they going to go outside their comfort zone and try to exploit OSU's defensive weaknesses that have been apparent in the first four games? I think I hope it's the former.
As has the OSU pass defense. I think it's pretty certain they're not going to run a pass-dominated offense, but they've got to be tempted to try to exploit the open-field tackling and downfield coverage issues, even though their offense isn't good at that right now.BUCKDUBBS007;2221866; said:I dont know if they will pass much, Maxwell has been pretty horrible this year.
SEREbuckeye;2221802; said:I dont buy that one bit. Just like when these players were recruited its way too early to tell.
IMO, guys like Hyde, Smith, Miller, Roby, Howard, Hankins, Simon will find a home.
Buckeyevsworld;2221812; said:It was two days before my 23rd birthday. It's impossible for me to forget.-_-
Buckeyevsworld;2221812; said:It was two days before my 23rd birthday. It's impossible for me to forget.-_-
muffler dragon;2221887; said:Your constitution towards memory wiping drunkeness is weak!
I think they fall right into our hands...if they have to go out of the comfort zone, I suspect we will see a lot of turnovers. I think we really match up well against this team, on both sides of the ball. I think this is the game where you can see what Urban's hands really have done to this team. Last year in this game we saw a vanilla game plan offensively, in which we actually had to bench Miller for Bauserman. Braxton has obviously become a game breaker since then, leading this offense. Hyde, who also wasn't given much of an opportunity last year, but showed he was actually able to bang through their defense for some yards, could be huge if healthy. I am excited to see the game plan. If our WRs can hold onto the ball, then we should be quite successful.I'm curious whether MSU is going to go with their usual offensive approach this game. We haven't had a chance to see it much yet, but I suspect the OSU defense will be reasonably good at defending an inside power rushing game. Is MSU going to stick with their bread & butter, and try to attack what is probably the strength of the OSU defense? Or are they going to go outside their comfort zone and try to exploit OSU's defensive weaknesses that have been apparent in the first four games? I think I hope it's the former.