Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If the source of your pride is any of the characteristics in your signature (and I'm not suggesting it is), that's nothing to be proud of.
or i could call it neither since it's neither.Well, you could label it strawman fallacy as misrepresenting my statement, or if it tickles your fancy you could call it an ad hominem attack.
If the source of your pride is any of the characteristics in your signature (and I'm not suggesting it is), that's nothing to be proud of.
If the source of your pride is any of the characteristics in your signature (and I'm not suggesting it is), that's nothing to be proud of.
But it is OK to be proud to be a women who roars. OK to be a proud black man. Gay pride people even have gay pride parades. White man though = devil.
Even though no white alive now ever owned slaves. Even though no blacks alive were slaves. Even though gays face zero actual discrimination.
That's not just inner-city. Any area with persistent multi-generational poverty the young are on the whole not given to requisite life skills to advance to a higher socio-economic level. Not to mention those around you will not be happy for you or even the least bit supportive, perhaps to the point of trying to drag you back down.
or i could call it neither since it's neither.
Re-read what I said. I'm not clear on what, exactly, your point was, but I didn't infer that your pride related to your personal characteristics secured at birth entirely by accident.If that is what you got out of it, then I think you missed the point.
To the extent one needs to express pride, it ought to relate to one's accomplishments rather than any accident of birth. IMO.