fourteenandoh
My swing feels like an unfolding lawn chair.
footballfanatic;731890; said:A one-sided win between two teams that went on to have mediocre seasons.Going 12-1 and playing for an NC is mediocre? You're on crack!
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
footballfanatic;731890; said:A one-sided win between two teams that went on to have mediocre seasons.Going 12-1 and playing for an NC is mediocre? You're on crack!
By those criteria, I wonder what kind of season Michigan had :(fourteenandoh;734426; said:A one-sided win between two teams that went on to have mediocre seasons.footballfanatic;731890; said:Going 12-1 and playing for an NC is mediocre? You're on crack!
footballfanatic;731834; said:I've been thinking about the games we had with you over the last two years.
I sure wish we could play again next year. The year-long build-up helped get me through the boring off-season.
I believe Texas "won" the series, even though the teams split the games.
Why?
Because ultimately, the Texas win was more meaningful. Texas went to Columbus and beat a much better team than OSU beat in Austin. Winning in Columbus at night against your powerful team prepared Texas for their final challenge against USC. I still contend that OSU was better than USC last year, and that the win was harder, since your defense was so stout.
Because you throttled a less-than-great team in Austin, it may have begun to create an air of complacency that finally caught up with you in Glendale. Quite simply, we sucked last year, and were highly overrated. You exposed a weak secondary. Hell, BAYLOR scored over 30 on us.
To sum up, Texas made more of their win, because the win was so hard. Ohio State handled a mediocre Texas team easily in the rematch, and the result was to create an air of overconfidence.
I sure wish we could play at least every other year.
Good luck in 07.

Adam Locked;735116; said:I've never quite seen an argument shut down like that one...
Why? Because in your mind it makes Texas look better?I've read all the comments. I've thought about the different points, counterpoints.
My argument is sound and correct.
Everyone is wrongly comparing Texas '07 with Ohio State '07.
thanks, judge judy.footballfanatic;741817; said:I've read all the comments. I've thought about the different points, counterpoints.
Really? 4 of 5 in the secondary were first year starters. The LBs as well (Animal had a whopping 2 games the year before). The DL was the only veteran unit, and was the strength of the defense all year.the senior leadership
Why? Texas '06 didn't play Ohio State '07.footballfanatic;741817; said:Everyone is wrongly comparing Texas '07 with Ohio State '07.
You need to compare Texas '06 with Ohio State '07.
No they sucked this year, it doesn't count.Why? Texas '06 didn't play Ohio State '07.
My favorite part of this whole thing is how you claim that Texas '06 was a better team than Ohio State '07, so Texas somehow "won" the series. Forgetting, of course, that Ohio State '06 was better than Texas '07, but somehow that doesn't factor into your calculations.
HailToMichigan;742144; said:Why? Texas '06 didn't play Ohio State '07.
My favorite part of this whole thing is how you claim that Texas '06 was a better team than Ohio State '07, so Texas somehow "won" the series. Forgetting, of course, that Ohio State '06 was better than Texas '07, but somehow that doesn't factor into your calculations.
Still domer-esque.footballfanatic;742348; said:Here's a calculation: Texas '05 was better than Michigan '05.