• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Texas 21, Alabama 37 (BCSCG) Jan 7, 2010 on ABC

Nobody is giving the SEC national titles. They are winning it. People can try to discredit it..act like it doesn't happen,but it's reality.

It's not just a coincidence they have won 4 in a row..Their formula is working,and everyone hates it.
 
Upvote 0
powerlifter;1639031; said:
Nobody is giving the SEC national titles. They are winning it. People can try to discredit it..act like it doesn't happen,but it's reality.

It's not just a coincidence they have won 4 in a row..Their formula is working,and everyone hates it.

No, we don't hate it. Pretty sure what we do hate is the arrogance.
 
Upvote 0
Gatorubet;1638965; said:
Now you are really grasping at straws. Three different teams from one's same conference winning the MNC in three consecutive years and you talk about other teams not doing anything worth talking about? IC, I hope you live to the ripe old age of 100, and that the Bucks win forty more Big-10 titles, every Rose Bowl you play in, and numerous MNCs. But if that fortunate occurrence happens, I very much think that you will have died never experiencing three different teams Big-10 teams winning the MNC in three consecutive years.* The next obvious factor is that you demean the SEC's Bowl record of 6-4 while, I suppose, thinking the Big-10's 4-3 2010 bowl record is far better than ours. One team won a BCSNC, and that was an SEC team. The Bucks win was awesome. But, all due respect, not an achievement equal to a BCSNC. One team had an offensive performance that set the all time BCS passing offense and individual yards record. That was also an SEC team. Maybe you have a bowl game (non-BCS of course) that you thinks stacks up to that accomplishment, and will inform us all. But if not, your comment is silly. My commenting on SEC success is not meant as a slam at you. The Big-10 had a really successful year, and you had a good bowl showing. I have no need to criticize your conference for anything they did this fall. Finally some of the heat is off of you due to the great victory over the Ducks. And I have no desire to insult anything about tOSU, a program that I have grown fond of and that has one of the true coaching greats.

But you leave me wondering how you reconcile the part of your brain that says that SEC victories do not inure to other SEC teams while maintaining that the fourth in a row BCSNC is somehow diminished by you pointing out an SEC bowl win percentage higher than the Big-10s...

As to your "automatic berth to the MNC" slam, anyone with the slightest bit of neutrality has to admit that six of six somewhat validates the premise supporting the "automatic berth". I remember lots of lobbying by Meyer, bitching about his lobbying, but nothing about any auto bid. Anyway, if it is an auto bid, never losing a BCSCG in six tries can have an effect on voters' minds even more compelling than the mighty S-E-C chant. :biggrin:

Congrats on a great season for the Big-10 and for Ohio State, who did the most to bury the myth of Big-10 inadequacy in a highly public manner.


* Of course, that is not meant as smack or an insult, and I've been advised that you don't give a crap about any one in the conference save the Buckeyes - right? I mean, its certainly not a slap at tOSU. You guys have carried the water for the whole Big-10 for years.

Truth be told, this post has some merit. After all, we are bragging about being the only conference to beat 4 top 15 teams in 4 bowl games. Twice.
 
Upvote 0
powerlifter;1639031; said:
Nobody is giving the SEC national titles. They are winning it. People can try to discredit it..act like it doesn't happen,but it's reality.

It's not just a coincidence they have won 4 in a row..Their formula is working,and everyone hates it.

Two of those wins came against a single team, us, and one against a team that didn't have its starting QB for 99% of the game. They are on a great run, but I'm sorry, that's not dominating the college football landscaping imo.
 
Upvote 0
Tresselbeliever;1639044; said:
Two of those wins came against a single team, us, and one against a team that didn't have its starting QB for 99% of the game. They are on a great run, but I'm sorry, that's not dominating the college football landscaping imo.

Ingram had a huge impact on that game..He sit for most of the second half. I don't see very many people saying..if he would have played the entire second half it wouldn't have even been close.That's something you have to consider as well..and the what if's and might have beens mean literally nothing. I don't think anyone is asking for people to believe the SEC is a dominate conference..It's pretty much a given. Nobody has to believe that though..To each their own.Your or my opinion has no impact on a national level,and it will be what it will be.

If the Big Ten won 4 in a row,i'd be happy. It would give our conference some leverage in the polls.
 
Upvote 0
Coqui;1639043; said:
Truth be told, this post has some merit. After all, we are bragging about being the only conference to beat 4 top 15 teams in 4 bowl games. Twice.

I wouldn't give a damn if I didn't hear about how shitty the Big 10 was, or if I didn't hear "SEC!!! SEC!!" after every SEC victory.

I didn't really care the first time it happened.
 
Upvote 0
powerlifter;1639050; said:
Ingram had a huge impact on that game..He sit for most of the second half. I don't see very many people saying..if he would have played the entire second half it wouldn't have even been close.That's something you have to consider as well..and the what if's and might have beens mean literally nothing. I don't think anyone is asking for people to believe the SEC is a dominate conference..It's pretty much a given. Nobody has to believe that though..To each their own.Your or my opinion has no impact on a national level,and it will be what it will be.

If the Big Ten won 4 in a row,i'd be happy. It would give our conference some leverage in the polls.

Ingram sitting didn't have near the impact of Texas losing McCoy.

If if's and but's were ho's and slut's we'd all have AIDs....or roidrage.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeMike80;1639057; said:
Ingram sitting didn't have near the impact of Texas losing McCoy.

If if's and but's were ho's and slut's we'd all have AIDs....or roidrage.

Right,because they had backups that produced,and won..Texas didn't have a reliable qb to come in(although I thought he done pretty well). That isn't bama's fault.
 
Upvote 0
powerlifter;1639050; said:
Ingram had a huge impact on that game..He sit for most of the second half. I don't see very many people saying..if he would have played the entire second half it wouldn't have even been close.That's something you have to consider as well..and the what if's and might have beens mean literally nothing. I don't think anyone is asking for people to believe the SEC is a dominate conference..It's pretty much a given. Nobody has to believe that though..To each their own.Your or my opinion has no impact on a national level,and it will be what it will be.

I understand that. Not trying to second guess the outcome of the game, or underestimating SEC's dominance of late, but just making an observation that two wins against OSU and a win against a McCoyless UT doesn't mean you own cfb.
 
Upvote 0
powerlifter;1639050; said:
Ingram had a huge impact on that game..He sit for most of the second half. I don't see very many people saying..if he would have played the entire second half it wouldn't have even been close.That's something you have to consider as well..and the what if's and might have beens mean literally nothing. I don't think anyone is asking for people to believe the SEC is a dominate conference..It's pretty much a given. Nobody has to believe that though..To each their own.Your or my opinion has no impact on a national level,and it will be what it will be.

If the Big Ten won 4 in a row,i'd be happy. It would give our conference some leverage in the polls.

The B10 dominating most of the history of CFB doesn't seem to mean jack shit, so why should the SEC winning mostly home games mean a damn thing?
 
Upvote 0
Tresselbeliever;1639063; said:
I understand that. Not trying to second guess the outcome of the game, or underestimating SEC's dominance of late, but just making an observation that two wins against OSU and a win against a McCoyless UT doesn't mean you own cfb.

I agree,but to some degree when it's the national title on the line,most other games take a backseat. Regardless of opponent,it is what it is. Does that mean they are going to dominate every year? Nope...It just means until someone else steps up..We are all going to hear about it.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top