Sloopy45
Pimp Minister Sinister
stxbuck:
"1- Marked For Death"
Correct.
"-don't remember his characters name"
Jon Hatcher. Screwface was the villain.
"2-No idea"
Out for Justice. Name: Gino Felino, Villain: Richie Modano.
"3-Forget the title, it is the 1st one, where he wakes up from a coma and hooks up w/ Kelly LeBrock
Hard to Kill. Name: Mason Storm. Villain: Forget.
"4-Under Siege"
Correct. Name: Casey Ryback. Villains: William Stranyx (TLJ), & Commander Kryll (Gary Busey).
"5-no idea"
Above the Law. Name: Nico Toscani. Villain: Zagon.
"6-no idea"
The Glimmer Man. Name: Jack Cole. Villain: Smith & Deverell.
LV: "When Star Wars (IV) came out, there was no plan to make V, VI, I, II, or III."
Actually, you are incorrect. Lucas originally wrote a very long script which was about 6 hours (movie-time) in length. He knew he couldn't make a 6 hour sci-fi flick, so he took the first 1/3 and made Star Wars, and put the rest of it on the backburner in the slim chance that the movie was a hit and he'd get the funding to make the sequels.
Had there never, ever been any idea to make a sequel to Star Wars, then Darth Vader would've been killed at the end of A New Hope.
"well, i don't know about you, but i liked Jedi because i was eight... my sister, who is nine years older than me, thought that Jedi was colossal horseshit, and that the Ewoks totally sucked... perspective, my friend..."
What's the point here? Jedi grossed (whatever it was) $500 million dollars. You're telling me there's not one adult in 1983 who saw it and liked it?
"i realise that you are entitled to your opinion, but that an opinion doesn't make it so..."
When did I say that my opinion "made it so?" In the blurb that you quoted from me, I merely said, "I don't like the new ones." I don't see where I said, "I don't like it, so you shouldn't like it, and buckeyegrad shouldn't like it, and it shall go down in history as FACT that these movies sucked!" You like Phish, I don't. I like Star Wars, your sister doesn't. Its all opinion. I'm still trying to grasp your point in this rebuttal.
"this is my favorite so far, especially in your case... i hope you can step back, and relish that statement in all it's delicious irony..."
???? - Still trying to grasp a point here. I like Star Wars and don't like the new movies so I'm a fool ... or following a fool ... or foolish. Because buckeyegrad and I have differing opinions of a movie (which we disagree but both acknowledge are opinions), I'm a fool. Okay, makes sense.
I think you should go back and read this thread from soup to nuts before you venture an opinion. That's just my take. But then again, I'm a fool. Or following a fool.
"i loved the original three, and i love the new three... it's entertainment, not religion..."
Where did I state that its religion? Its a movie! Because its not 'dead-serious' life or faith, no one is allowed to have a passionate opinion about it?
"1- Marked For Death"
Correct.
"-don't remember his characters name"
Jon Hatcher. Screwface was the villain.
"2-No idea"
Out for Justice. Name: Gino Felino, Villain: Richie Modano.
"3-Forget the title, it is the 1st one, where he wakes up from a coma and hooks up w/ Kelly LeBrock
Hard to Kill. Name: Mason Storm. Villain: Forget.
"4-Under Siege"
Correct. Name: Casey Ryback. Villains: William Stranyx (TLJ), & Commander Kryll (Gary Busey).
"5-no idea"
Above the Law. Name: Nico Toscani. Villain: Zagon.
"6-no idea"
The Glimmer Man. Name: Jack Cole. Villain: Smith & Deverell.
LV: "When Star Wars (IV) came out, there was no plan to make V, VI, I, II, or III."
Actually, you are incorrect. Lucas originally wrote a very long script which was about 6 hours (movie-time) in length. He knew he couldn't make a 6 hour sci-fi flick, so he took the first 1/3 and made Star Wars, and put the rest of it on the backburner in the slim chance that the movie was a hit and he'd get the funding to make the sequels.
Had there never, ever been any idea to make a sequel to Star Wars, then Darth Vader would've been killed at the end of A New Hope.
"well, i don't know about you, but i liked Jedi because i was eight... my sister, who is nine years older than me, thought that Jedi was colossal horseshit, and that the Ewoks totally sucked... perspective, my friend..."
What's the point here? Jedi grossed (whatever it was) $500 million dollars. You're telling me there's not one adult in 1983 who saw it and liked it?
"i realise that you are entitled to your opinion, but that an opinion doesn't make it so..."
When did I say that my opinion "made it so?" In the blurb that you quoted from me, I merely said, "I don't like the new ones." I don't see where I said, "I don't like it, so you shouldn't like it, and buckeyegrad shouldn't like it, and it shall go down in history as FACT that these movies sucked!" You like Phish, I don't. I like Star Wars, your sister doesn't. Its all opinion. I'm still trying to grasp your point in this rebuttal.
"this is my favorite so far, especially in your case... i hope you can step back, and relish that statement in all it's delicious irony..."
???? - Still trying to grasp a point here. I like Star Wars and don't like the new movies so I'm a fool ... or following a fool ... or foolish. Because buckeyegrad and I have differing opinions of a movie (which we disagree but both acknowledge are opinions), I'm a fool. Okay, makes sense.
I think you should go back and read this thread from soup to nuts before you venture an opinion. That's just my take. But then again, I'm a fool. Or following a fool.
"i loved the original three, and i love the new three... it's entertainment, not religion..."
Where did I state that its religion? Its a movie! Because its not 'dead-serious' life or faith, no one is allowed to have a passionate opinion about it?
Upvote
0
entertaining? 
Whatever the hell that is supposed to mean.
