Her attitude about the situation, if it is indicative of the quotes in the paper, is disappointing.
Matta didn't make her son play poor defense.
Did she think we should keep playing him while he was getting blown by many times by people he was trying to guard?
If she didn't notice that Lighty played great defense and her son was horrible on that end of the floor, and later inconsistently on the offensive end as well, she must not know a whole bunch about basketball.
And if she didn't notice that Matta emphasizes defense then she didn't do her due diligence when selecting a college program.
It's interesting. Her attitude, and if DQ's is similar, ar in such stark contrast to Lighty's as revealed in that article during the tourney run where he basically told coach "Whatever you need me to do".
I really want DQ to come back, I think he can be great on both ends, but he may need to grow up a little. If that IS the case, he stands a better chance of growing up under Thad than the NBA, which will feed a poor attitude if he has one.
*Edited because I went over the line with some of my comments, as aptly pointed out by better posters here