Anyone still questioning Reds' trade for Scott Rolen?
Some of us might have questioned the trade for Scott Rolen.
A portion of us might have suggested the Reds were, you know, nuts.
We will deny all knowledge of what we might have said and thought last July 31, when the club traded two young pitchers and dumped Edwin Encarnacion, to bring in a 34-year-old with durability issues and a large paycheck.
If we weren't disavowing, we might admit to saying back then, "This is a move a contending team makes, not a small-money team revving up to finish fourth."
We might have added, "Rolen will cost them millions they should be spending on developing kids. The Reds aren't ready to win. Why bring in an old, expensive guy who is?"
If we were admitting to saying any of that. Which we are not.
It can be said now that Walt Jocketty and Bob Castellini acquiring Scott Rolen was pretty much a masterstroke. The general manager and owner had concluded the home clubhouse was a mess. The "culture" as Jocketty called it, was aimless. There were players who wanted to win. They didn?t know how. Rolen knew.
Jocketty knew Rolen knew, having watched him in St. Louis, where he'd played on two World Series teams. The GM saw Rolen's "subtle leadership" and guessed it would work a little magic in Cincinnati. He was right. Boy, was he ever.
It isn't just that Rolen came off the bench to pop a game-tying two-run homer in the 9th inning Tuesday. It's not that he has filled the gaping hole at cleanup. If that were all Rolen had done for the Reds, the trade would have made sense. It's the other stuff.
Rolen is a quiet, no-nonsense guy with the mindset of a mule. It got him in deep with Tony La Russa in St. Louis, because La Russa is the same way. It's the right attitude here, though, on a team of mostly young believers, and older guys who are tired of losing. Rolen comes in every day and goes to work.
Cont'd ...